ESPN DeportesDream y Valkyries pelean al tú por tú título en último cuartoESPNWWE Money in the Bank takeaways: Everyone wants a shot at Roman ReignsLa NaciónSe casaron Lali Espósito y Pedro Rosemblat: del primer mensaje en Instagram a dar el sí, así es su historia de amor한겨레북, 전술탄도미사일 집속탄두 시험…“13㏊ 초토화”PunchDEZNY’s journey from school performances to AMVCAInquirerCIDG seizes P1.7-M ‘smuggled’ cigarettes in Zamboanga SibugayInquirer EntertainmentCup of Joe to take temporary break after December concertsUOLManeva e Mato Seco fazem shows grátis na Praça da Luz, no centro de SPThe Jerusalem PostTrump says US ready to hit Iran's nuclear program 'in ten minutes' after speaking with NetanyahuZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioMalay MailNew Chinese ambassador Yao Wen outlines four key priorities to deepen Malaysia-China ties경향신문경주엑스포대공원, ‘APEC 기념공원’으로···정상회의 기념관 개관
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Sunday, November 1, 2026

No legal basis to hold 9-year-old in remand, says activist

Translate

There is no legal basis for a nine-year old Myanmar child to be held in custody, a child rights activist said while criticising a magistrate’s decision to deny bail for three other Myanmar children charged with criminal intimidation.

Yayasan Chow Kit founder Hartini Zainudin questioned if the authorities would have handled Malaysian children the same way.

“After 30 years in this work, I do not believe we would. We would call the parents, bring in welfare officers, mediate between neighbours, and use the Child Act as Parliament intended,” she said, as the legislation protected every child in Malaysia and had “no citizenship clause”.

“The way the state has responded to these children should trouble anyone who works in child protection.” she said.

On Friday, the magistrate’s court in Bukit Mertajam denied bail for the three Myanmar boys, two aged 11 and one aged 12 after they were charged with criminal intimidation of an elderly woman. However, the High Court later reversed the decision and allowed the boys to be released on bail.

They, and a nine-year-old boy, had been arrested on Oct 27, and were held in custody for four days.

“There is no lawful basis to hold a nine-year-old as a suspect,” said Hartini. She said the Penal Code provides that a child under 10 cannot commit an offence, and even upon conviction a child under 14 cannot be sent to prison.

She said under the Child Act 2001, the boys should have been released

She also said the children may not have understood the charges read to them, noting that although the court arranged for an interpreter, many Rohingya children do not speak Burmese.

Hartini said a child who does not understand a charge cannot meaningfully answer it.

She also questioned the media coverage of the case, and the use of photograph of the children being brought to court, publication of their street address and the detail that their families live next door to the complainant.

“Section 15 of the Child Act exists to prevent exactly this,” she said referring to the stipulation that restricts media reporting and publication regarding children involved in legal proceedings.

The three boys were jointly charged with threatening to hurt the woman using several objects, including a mop, an iron rod, a white fluorescent light tube and stones.

Subscribe to our newsletter and get news delivered to your mailbox.

View the original on Free Malaysia Today →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.