InquirerNortheasterly winds, ITCZ to bring rains in PH on FridayESPN DeportesLa 'Hormiga' González y el Olympiacos suman tres puntos en MarsellaDaily MaverickEXTREME WEATHER : Agriculture Minister sounds ‘super El Niño’ warning bell and calls for water restrictionsESPNWhat would a 24-team College Football Playoff bracket look like?RTP DesportoSporting assegura Ronda Principal, FC Porto afastado da `Champions` de andebolThe Jerusalem PostUS midterms could reshape support for Israel as anti-Israel sentiment grows among votersZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioCollider6 Best Detective Movies Released Since 2020, RankedCBS NewsThe safety questions facing America's roller coastersCNN بالعربيةاعتذار ومقترح بـ25 مليون دولار لكل اتحاد.. إليك نتائج اجتماع "فيفا" في زيورخRFI 中文趋势研究:德国对华贸易逆差将超过1000亿欧元BillboardGarbage to Close 2026 Tour With Free Show at Mexico City’s Zócalo: ‘It’s an Extraordinary Honor’
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Thursday, October 15, 2026

Anthropic is letting METR researchers look under the hood with employee-level access

Translate

Anthropic is giving employee-level access to six researchers from METR, a nonprofit that tests frontier AI models, to independently assess Anthropic’s models, safety practices, and risk management, the company said in a blog post on Thursday.

The arrangement comes at a time where incidents of AI agents acting outside their instructions have been disclosed every week or two since late August. The incidents have sharpened calls for independent checks on AI companies.

“We want to be publicly accountable for the decisions we’re making,” Anthropic said in the blog post. “We aim to close the gap between what evaluators understand about a frontier AI company’s systems and what the company itself understands.”

Under the new arrangement, the METR team has Anthropic-issued company laptops, office space, and access to internal tools roughly on par with what Anthropic’s own risk assessment teams use. “Anthropic employees are encouraged to share information with them just as they would with a fellow employee working on alignment risk” the company said.

Anthropic compared the arrangement to banking, similar to how regulators place resident examiners inside the largest banks. 

METR will publish its own assessments of Anthropic’s risks, incidents, and practices, and the company has given up the right to block them.

“Anthropic can’t veto publication, but we can require them to redact information if it falls into narrow, pre-defined categories,” the company said, such as customer data, anything attorney-client privileged, or relating to information about its model architectures. “METR is free to characterize our redactions publicly, and say whether it believes the redactions were justified, as long as it does so without revealing the redacted information” Anthropic added.

METR is the only evaluator so far at the top of a three-tier system Anthropic is building. Evaluators in the bottom tier, like biosecurity nonprofit SecureBio, run narrow reviews and require Anthropic’s approval to publish. The middle tier gets more information and can publish without approval, while the top tier adds METR’s employee-level access. 

Thursday’s announcement makes good on a promise Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei made in a September essay, where he proposed embedding outside evaluators inside AI labs as a first step toward slowing the technology’s development. OpenAI quickly pledged the same, and both companies, along with Google, Meta, Nvidia and xAI, have since signed a White House accord committing to independent review.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Aditya Mehta is a reporter at TechCrunch covering AI. He’s supported by the Tarbell Center for AI Journalism and attended UC Berkeley. You can contact from Aditya by emailing [email protected] or via encrypted message at adymehta.74 on Signal.

View the original on TechCrunch →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.