Bollywood HungamaEXCLUSIVE: Samarth Jurel to make special appearance in Emraan Hashmi-starrer Gunmaaster G9The Jerusalem PostHackers hit Ukraine, Russia's emergency apps, send fake nuclear, chemical attack alertsPunchAccord asks court to dismiss suit seeking candidates’ disqualificationInquirerOver 9,000 passengers monitored in S. Tagalog ports on Nov. 2 – PCGDaily MaverickEl Niño threatens SA’s crops, but ample maize stocks cushion the blowInquirer EntertainmentAshtine Olviga, David Licauco say they are not competing with other love teamsTechCrunch42AI comes out of stealth with $62.5M and a world model that can ‘predict human behavior’The Hollywood ReporterEzra Frech on Tackling ‘DWTS’ Season 35 With Amber Glenn as “Teammates” and What Becoming the Show’s First Amputee Winner Would MeanZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-Nachrichtenstudio20 MinutenEndlich gibts gestochen scharfe Bilder des GespensterfischsVanguardHow I met my wife 22 years ago – Actor Odunlade Adekolaعالم التقنيةسامسونج تبدأ إنتاج شاشة الخصوصية لهاتف Galaxy S27 Pro تمهيدًا للإطلاق مطلع 2027
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Monday, November 2, 2026

A Bizarre Finale For Midterms 2026: Haley Stevens Bombshell Created One Of The Cycle’s Memorable TV Moments

Translate

Donald Trump is wrapping up his midterm spring with a series of tele-rallies and remarks at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, reinforcing his focus on D.C.’s monuments, golf courses and a proposed victory arch.

But his final days closing argument may not compete with the drama playing out in Michigan, where the losing Democratic primary candidates, Rep. Haley Stevens (D-MI) shocked the political world by endorsing Republican Mike Rogers rather than her party’s nominee, Abdul El-Sayed.

All day on Sunday, there seemed to be a back-and-forth of praised from the right, and puzzled outrage on the left. By day’s end, pollsters and prognosticators tried to game out its influence on the remaining Michigan voter pool, in a state where El-Sayed had seemingly been gaining a lead.

The finale was Anderson Cooper‘s interview with Stevens on Sunday night, in which the CNN anchor attempted to shed some light on why she had suddenly shifted her allegiances.

Cooper pressed her on what changed overnight, as she had reportedly spoken to Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-MI) around midnight and gave no indication that she would back Rogers.

As Stevens insisted that El-Sayed got “angrier and angrier,” Cooper challenged her on the explanation.

He noted that El-Sayed had said that he did not agree with the contents of an outside group’s ad, which has been called antisemitic. Stevens, who had urged El-Sayed to denounce the ad as a condition of her appearance at a unity event, released a statement on Saturday saying she was “glad” that El-Sayed said that.

Cooper asked, “At some point last night, what changed, other than he had put out that statement and disinvited you from that church service? Is that — was that the angrier and angrier part that you’re focusing on?”

Stevens answered, “Anderson, this is a broader point about what’s going on in our party. OK?”

She added, “We were just recognizing — look, I haven’t cast my vote yet. You know, people, my neighbors were asking me. They’re undecided. They feel the same way.”

Cooper said, “So you might change your mind again?”

She replied, “Anderson, my mind is made up. I’m rock solid. I’m an independent woman. I made my decision. You know, I still love my party a whole lot. I know there’s a lot of people working really hard on elections all over this country. I really project that Democrats are going to win big.”

He later noted that Stevens posted on social media in August, “Mike Rogers will be another rubber stamp for Donald Trump’s dangerous agenda. We can’t afford to give MAGA another Senate seat in November.” She never addressed how she could come to support him now, other than to say she is just one voter.

Stevens said, “Why is it OK to have the Democratic Party and a top nominee, you know, ejecting, you know, this type of or injecting rather this type of anger and lack of kindness? That’s all. I’m one Democrat.”

At one point, as Cooper continued to press her, Stevens said that El-Sayed said, “I don’t need your endorsement.”

She said, “That’s fine. You know. And why the anger? Why the frustration? Why the obsession with Iran and all these other issues about, you know, what’s going on overseas? What are we going to do here in this country?”

Later Dingell appeared on CNN, telling Cooper that she was not sure she would have done the interview if she knew she would be on right after Stevens. “That was one of the most painful interviews I have ever watched,” Dingell said.

The interview was a reminder that politics often is defined by personality, intra-party conflicts which tend to be glossed in the midst of campaign season spin and only revealed in media post mortems. That’s why the Cooper interview was so unusual. (A bit of irony: It was a different Mike Rogers, congressman from Alabama, who lunged at Matt Gaetz on the House floor in 2023, another fabled moment of party discord).

And for Democrats, Sunday was a reminder of Will Rogers, as well as the cliche of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. The Cooper interview was a standout moment of midterm drama, with Tuesday’s results shedding light on whether it has much of an impact.

View the original on Deadline →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.