Paramount-Warner Bros. Merger Set to Close Next Week After Judge OKs Settlement With State AGs

Paramount chief David Ellison, after a fierce year-long battle, is finally about to get his hands on Warner Bros. Discovery — in the most expensive takeover in Hollywood history.

On Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín, who is overseeing the antitrust case aimed at blocking the Paramount-Warner Bros. deal approved Paramount’s settlement with the 12 Democratic state attorneys general who brought the case to resolve the litigation.

The order approving the settlement by Martínez-Olguín was the final remaining barrier to Paramount’s debt-fueled $111 billion merger with Warner Bros. Discovery, after it had been cleared by regulators in 68 jurisdictions worldwide including the Justice Department. Paramount has tentatively set next Tuesday, Oct. 6, to close the merger, according to regulatory filings.

“[T]he Court finds the proposed consent decree represents a reasonable factual and legal resolution of the dispute,” Martínez-Olguín wrote in her order.

The merged Paramount-WBD will bring together two of Hollywood’s biggest movie studios; the HBO Max and Paramount+ streaming services; and TV businesses including CBS, CNN, MTV, TBS, Comedy Central, Food Network and more. The new company’s entertainment franchises will span Harry Potter, “Game of Thrones” and other HBO hits, the DC Universe, “Yellowstone,” “Mission: Impossible,” “Top Gun” and the Nickelodeon kids’ empire.

Some of the top leadership of the soon-to-be-merged company, whose name hasn’t been revealed at this point, is already taking shape.

On Wednesday came word that Ellison has recruited Ynon Kreiz, who is stepping down as Mattel’s CEO, for a senior management role at the combined Paramount-WBD. Casey Bloys, head of WBD’s HBO, is poised to assume oversight of the combined Paramount-Warner Bros. streaming business after Cindy Holland announced Tuesday she was stepping down from her role running Paramount+ and other direct-to-consumer.

With the deal close, Warner Bros. Discovery CEO David Zaslav is expected to depart. Zaslav stands to earn more than $550 million in stock and cash once the Paramount-WBD deal closes, including $34.2 million in cash severance payments. Other top WBD execs anticipated to exit include chief revenue and strategy officer Bruce Campbell and CFO Gunnar Wiedenfels.

Martínez-Olguín’s ruling came after merger opponents filed official objections with the court over Paramount’s settlement with the states. The consent decree includes no structural remedies (i.e., divestitures) as California Attorney General Rob Bonta, who led the coalition of states in suing to stop the looming merger, had previously insisted on.

Among the terms: Paramount-WBD is prohibited from selling the Paramount Studios or Warner Bros. lots in the state for at least five years, and is obligated to invest at least an additional $300 million on film production in the U.S. annually. The combined Paramount-WB also must release at least 30 movies for theatrical distribution in the first two years (something Ellison has repeatedly promised he would do) and at least 32 in years 3-5, with a 45-day window for wide-release films. The merged Paramount-Warner Bros. also will be subject to monitoring by a “news editorial independence board,” which will establish “guiding editorial and journalism principles for” for CNN and CBS News.

Questioned by the judge last week about how the settlement addresses the state AGs’ concerns over fair competition in the three markets identified in the lawsuit — wide-release movies, tentpole movies and basic cable — Paula Blizzard, senior assistant attorney general for the antitrust section of the California Attorney General’s Office, said the reasoning was that the states were wary about permanently blocking the Paramount-WBD deal — and she said Warner Bros. Discovery, if it were denied the deal to merge with Paramount, would likely seek another M&A partner. “Sometimes we say, here are some remedies that will address the harm we see, but are not going to permanently change the structure by either completely blocking the merger or [requiring] divestment, and this is one of those cases,” Blizzard told the judge.

In her order, Martínez-Olguín wrote that she found that the proposed consent “includes important backstops requiring divestment of studios and/or cable channels in case of the combined entity’s failure to comply with the proposed consent decree’s terms. Further, the proposed consent decree imposes these requirements on film distribution and basic cable negotiations in the midst of a rapidly changing marketplace. The Court therefore finds that the proposed consent decree reflects a settlement between the parties that is a fair, reasonable, and good faith approach to address the competitive harms alleged in the Complaint, and does not violate the law or public policy.”

The groups behind the #BlockTheMerger coalition, for one, filed an amicus brief with the court urging Martínez-Olguín to reject the settlement. And the judge had left open the door to a potential additional third-party review of the settlement: Martínez-Olguin asked both the AGs and Paramount to respond to a letter submitted by Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) “to urge the Court to subject the proposed consent decree to an independent public-interest review before entering it.” In separate filings Monday, Paramount and the AGs countered that the deal was vigorously negotiated, has “teeth” and should not be subjected to an independent “public interest” review. Paramount lawyers argued that the deal resolves the AGs’ primary concern of a reduction in theatrical releases after it merges with Warner Bros. Discovery.