ESPNUFC 333 live results, analysis for Volkanovski vs. Evloev, Yan vs. DvalishviliESPN Deportes¿A qué prestar atención en el Juego 2 de la Serie Mundial?The Jerusalem PostHaredi Public's Moti Leitner: Israel’s future is our responsibility, too - opinionStraits Times SportSpurs celebrate ending Chelsea hoodoo with 2-0 winZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFColliderNetflix’s Twisty Crime Thriller Officially Returns After a 3-Year WaitSDP EspectáculosConcierto de Gloria Trevi en el Auditorio Nacional: setlist y telonero para el 24 de octubreХабрПочти разминулись. Какую роль могла сыграть встреча Земли и ТейиPremium Times2027: Minister threatens to deploy ‘federal might’ in Akwa Ibom electionSRF NewsGrosse Ehre für 22-Jährige – Werro zu Europas Leichtathletin des Jahres gekürtCBS NewsThis week on "Sunday Morning" (Oct. 25)Mexico News DailyMexico’s week in review: Trade optimism holds despite a CIA-linked treason case
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Saturday, October 24, 2026

Pennsylvania will require labels on AI-generated ads

Translate

Terrence O'Brien

is the Verge’s weekend editor. He’s covered the tech industry for over 18 years and knows a thing or two about synths.

On Thursday, Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro signed the Artificial Intelligence Deceptive Advertising Act into law, requiring disclosures on AI-generated ads. The law requires any ad — whether it’s a still image, video, audio, or text — that “has been significantly modified or generated by artificial intelligence” to include a label in the same format as the ad itself. That applies to TV commercials from multi-billion-dollar companies, as well as restaurants’ ugly, crowded flyers about their wing specials.

Pennsylvania is one of the first states to require disclosures on AI content. And it requires those labels regardless of where an ad was created. So you might see disclosures pop up in commercials in other states if they’re also expected to air in Pennsylvania.

The law leaves many loopholes, though. For one, what constitutes “significantly modified” is subjective. There is also a carve-out for “parody, satire, commentary or criticism,” as well as anything that is “evidently fictional.” Again, what “evidently fictional” means is unclear. The wording also suggests only content that “uses synthetic content in a manner that creates a false consumer perception” about a product or service would require a disclosure. Again, leaving questions about what qualifies as “false” under the law and who makes those decisions.

The office of State Senator Nick Pisciottano, who introduced the bill, did not immediately return a request for comment.

Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.

View the original on The Verge →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.