The Jerusalem PostAuthor Shulamit Lapid wins ACUM lifetime achievement awardESPN DeportesBarcelona detiene el fichaje de Julián Álvarez y valora alternativasPunchPolice arrest 40 suspects over robbery, kidnapping in AbujaBollywood HungamaVarun Dhawan fronts Fossil’s new machine X-1 collection, priced at Rs 40,995ESPNWhat Kyle Busch's death exposed about NASCAR's culture of toughnessוואלהחפץ חשוד אותר בתחנה המרכזית חוף הכרמלDaily MaverickIMPEACHMENT COMMITTEE : Ramaphosa objects to evidence leader over grudge claim as litigation threats loomNTVİstanbul Adalar'da peş peşe depremlerSportstarEast Bengal vs SC Delhi LIVE score: EBFC 0-0 SCD; Rashid hits the post twice; Durand Cup 2026 semifinal updatesBBC BusinessJump in energy bills drives UK inflation to highest rate for four monthsPremium TimesLiberia to accept 1,200 deportees from US01netLa Galaxy Watch Ultra 2025 dégringole à -60% et ce n’est pas une farce
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, August 19, 2026

Amazon fined ₹1 lakh over misleading ‘Ram Mandir Prasad’ sweets listing

Translate

The Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) has imposed a penalty of 1 lakh on Amazon Seller Services Private Limited for allowing ordinary sweets to be sold on its platform as “Shri Ram Mandir Ayodhya Prasad”, without any approval from the Ram Temple Trust.

According to Bar and Bench, the CCPA noted that devotees would, by default, consider the 'Shri Ram Mandir Ayodhya Prasad' as the food offered to and blessed by the deity. The penalty must be deposited within 15 days, it said.

“The commercial appropriation of this phrase for ordinary confectionery products, without any authorisation from the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust, constitutes not just a misleading trade practice under the CP Act but an affront to the religious sentiments of crores of consumers,” the order said.

The order was passed by Chief Commissioner Nidhi Khare and Commissioner Anupam Mishra on August 4, following a complaint by the Confederation of All India Traders in January 2024.

The CCPA also said Amazon was party to the publication of misleading advertisements since it hosted, displayed and facilitated the sale of the products, and it could not claim safe harbour protection available to intermediaries under Section 79 of the Information Technology Act (IT Act).

The complaint mentioned four varieties of sweets listed by Chandu Trading Company under the brand Bihar Brothers, mainly ghee ladoos, khoya ladoos, boondi ladoos and cow milk pedas.

View the original on Hindustan Times

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.