ESPNFollow live: Phillies even up Game 2 on solo homers by Schwarber and HarperESPN DeportesGil Mora con dolores en el tobillo; bajo observación previo a EE.UU.RTP DesportoCristiano Ronaldo arrisca seis meses de suspensão por abandonar seleção portuguesaDaily MaverickWILD OMISSION: South Africa’s lion bone trade — the consequences the government never consideredThe Jerusalem PostUK has 'strong indications' Iran was involved in RAF airbase bombing plot, Burnham saysTechCrunchFactory CEO just accused his VC board advisor of spying for CognitionBBC NewsPunish Man City this season, say other club chiefsABC News (Australia)Mother felt 'completely abandoned' during traumatic birth at NSW hospitalBBC News BrasilO cálculo de Lula para não ir ao debate da GloboRFI 中文英国“西藏观察”报告:无人机如何成为《高原上的眼睛》Radio-CanadaLe Canada à l’heure de la vérité et de la réconciliationDeadline‘Nobody Wants This’ Rabbi Consultant Slams Adam Brody As An “Ignorant Jew” Over “Free Palestine” Support
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, September 30, 2026

Google's early attempt to pay websites for AI answers is struggling

Translate

In general, publishers in the test seem to agree that certain topics that are not as widely covered but have strong niche interest earn more, including anime and gaming. However, publishers also say that tracking the payments from month to month in the search console is often confusing. It’s not clear what counts as a meaningful contribution to an AI answer, so it’s impossible to plan for future earnings.

A shifting landscape

Google has noted over the years that its goal is to organize the world’s information, but that only works if there’s information online to organize. Frontier AI models are trained on data from around the web, letting them answer many questions within the knowledge cutoff. But in a search context, those answers often need the backing of live web content. If websites stop publishing or start blocking Google, AI search quality will decline.

The AI contribution pilot is a step toward forging a new relationship between Google and the publishers it relies on. However, the small payments and unclear nature of AI contributions could make expanding the program difficult. In the meantime, ill will is growing.

Some publishers have already started fighting back against Google’s shift toward AI search. The New York Times has an ongoing copyright infringement lawsuit against the company, alleging that Google (and other AI firms) illegally used its content to train AI models. Penske Media, which operates sites like Variety and Rolling Stone, has sued Google over lost traffic. It says the company’s decision to tie AI scraping to standard web indexing is unfair. With no dedicated option to opt out, sites that want to appear in Google’s organic search results also have to be part of AI search.

Regulators are starting to take notice, too. Earlier this year, the UK government ordered Google to provide an AI opt-out for publishers that would not penalize them in organic search results. The European Commission is also running an antitrust probe to determine if Google is fairly compensating publishers for using their content in AI answers. Given the company’s recent track record in the EU, it seems unlikely that it will work out in Google’s favor.

View the original on Ars Technica →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.