'Judge cannot decide this case': Curative plea in SC seeks recall of earlier verdict on CEC, ECs appointment law

A curative petition has been filed in the Supreme Court for recall of the September 23 split verdict on the validity of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023, news agencies and legal news website reported on 30 September.

On September 23, in a significant development, the top court gave split opinions on whether a batch of pleas challenging the validity of the 2023 law that excludes the Chief Justice of India from the panel for selecting the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and Election Commissioners should be referred to a larger constitution bench, news agency PTI reported.

The plea by Jaya Thakur comes in the wake of some claims in media reports that the son of Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, who was part of the bench that delivered the split verdict, is the poll panel's standing counsel before the Madhya Pradesh High Court.

The plea filed through advocate Varun Thakur raises grounds of "reasonable apprehension of bias and propriety" and states that after the pronouncement of the split verdict, the petitioner came to know about Justice Sharma's son being on the EC's legal panel.

"In the respectful submission of the petitioner, there is a direct conflict of interest in the professional duty of Siddharth Sharma on behalf of the Election Commission of India and adjudication of lis challenging the appointment of Election Commissioners by Justice Satish Chandra Sharma... Because justice should not only be done, but manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done," the plea said.

It added that “a judge cannot decide a case” in which a family member of the judge is representing one of the parties, may be in a different fora and the propriety demanded that Justice Sharma ought to have disclosed about his son before the commencement of the proceedings.

'Reasonable likelihood of bias'

The plea further contended that the case is fully covered by the 'reasonable likelihood of bias' and 'real danger test' laid down by the Supreme Court and that Justice Sharma's presence on the bench vitiated the September 23 decision.

Jaya Thakur's plea further states that she verified the claims made in the media reports from the Madhya Pradesh High Court website, and found that Justice Sharma's son was empanelled with the EC since July 10, 2024.

The petition has been filed under the inherent jurisdiction of the court under Article 32 read with Article 142 of the Constitution and under Order 48 Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 in terms of the guidelines laid down in Rupa Ashok Hurra v. Ashok Hurra case related to filing of curative petitions.

The petitioner has sought exemption from first filing a review, arguing that it would be listed before the same bench and thus "no useful purpose would be served".

Under the Supreme Court rules, after the disposal of a case by the apex court, aggrieved parties can approach the top court for review of the decision by pointing to an "error apparent on face of the record".

The review petition is normally listed before the same judges who were part of the original bench for consideration of the matters in chambers except in exceptional circumstances, when open court hearing is allowed.

A curative petition is normally considered by a bench that includes the three senior judges of the top court and the judges who delivered the original judgment, if they are available.

‘Setting up a five-judge constitution bench’

On September 23, a bench of justices Dipankar Datta and Satish Chandra Sharma, which heard the matter for five days, said that due to a difference of opinion, the matter be placed before CJI Surya Kant on the administrative side for constitution of a bench of appropriate strength for an effective and authoritative adjudication.

The bench also requested the CJI to explore the possibility of setting up a permanent five-judge constitution bench for deciding seminal issues.

The batch of pleas challenged the constitutional validity of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023, which excludes the CJI from the selection panel for appointing election commissioners and CECs.

However, the Centre had submitted that the petitions raise seminal questions of constitutional importance and should be referred to the five-judge constitution bench.

(With PTI inputs)

About the Author

For about a decade, Livemint—News Desk has been a credible source for authentic and timely news, and well-researched analysis on national news, business, personal finance, corporates, politics and geopolitics. We bring the latest updates on all the listed companies on BSE and NSE, startups, mutual funds, Union ministries, geopolitics, and untapped human interest stories from around the world, helping our readers to stay informed on the latest developments around the globe. Our Coverage Areas 1. Companies: Comprehensive news and analysis on listed and unlisted companies, corporate announcements, corporate chatter, C-suite, business trends, hiring alerts, layoffs, work-life balance, world's top billionaires and richest and more. 2. Personal finance: Insights into mutual funds, small savings schemes like - PPF, SSY, post office savings scheme, stock to watch, personal loans, credit cards, top bank FDs, real estate, income tax and more. 3. Politics: Comprehensive coverage of general elections, state elections and bypolls, Lok Sabha, Vidhan Sabha, Parliament, PMO, PIB, finance ministry, home ministry, among other union ministries and government departments. 4. National News: From metro cities like Delhi, Mumbai, and e to untapped stories from rural India, we cover human interest, health, education, crime and courts, and law and order, among other areas of public interest. 5. Economy: In-depth analysis of India's macro and micro-economic indicators like- GDP, inflation, forex, fiscal deficit, current account deficit, interest rate cycle, economic recovery, RBI circulars, indirect taxes, GST, Insolvency and Bankruptcy imports, exports and everything that impacts Indian economy. 6. Geopolitics: Well-rounded and deeply researched coverage on US News, Oval Office European Union, Ukraine Russia War, middle-east crisis, royal families and global leaders like - Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin, Kim Jong Un, Xi Jinping and premiers of other leading economies in the world. Meet the Team 1. Gulam Jeelani, Political Affairs Editor 2. Sugam Singhal, Senior Assistant Editor 3. Chanchal, Assistant Editor 4. Sanchari Ghosh, Chief Content Producer 5. Pratik Prashant Mukane, Chief Content Producer 6. Sayantani Biswas, Chief Content Producer 7. Ravi Hari, Deputy Chief Content Producer 8. Garvit Bhirani, Deputy Chief Content Producer 9. Akriti Anand, Senior Content Producer 10. Jocelyn Felix Fernandes, Senior Content Producer 11. Swastika Das Sharma, Content Producer 12. Mausam Jha, Content Producer 13. Riya R Alex, Trainee Content Producer

^{Get Latest real-time updates}

Stay updated with the latest Trending, India, World and US news.

HomeNewsIndia'Judge cannot decide this case': Curative plea in SC seeks recall of earlier verdict on CEC, ECs appointment law