ESPN49ers hold off furious Commanders' second-half rally to go 6-0ESPN DeportesMike Evans sale por lesión en el Commanders vs. 49ersThe Jerusalem PostMacklemore’s ‘Free Palestine’ tour will benefit group that called Oct. 7 a ‘prison break’Inquirer EntertainmentRuffa Gutierrez says mom Annabelle Rama ‘alive and kicking’ amid ‘false stories’ZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-Nachrichtenstudio中国新闻网以明晰程序稳定出口预期 持续提升出口管制效能NHK 社会東大の総長選めぐり 文部科学省が選考経緯の検証を要請Lenta.ruПодросток порезал российскую туристку в центре одного из популярнейших городов мираNew Straits TimesMalaysia's exports smash record with 34pct surge to RM1.57 trillionSRF NewsKrieg in der Ukraine – Trump: Haben der Ukraine viel gegeben – und sie uns nichtsRMF24Wschodnia Polska z ostrzeżeniem. Trwa kolejny atak na UkrainęLa NaciónSarmiento le ganaba a Barracas Central con un golazo, pero el VAR llamó al árbitro Zamora para anularlo
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Tuesday, October 20, 2026

Mariah Carey Beats Brother’s $20 Million Defamation Lawsuit Over Tell-All Memoir

Translate

Mariah Carey has prevailed in a five-year legal battle with her brother, winning the dismissal of his remaining claims that she defamed him in her bestselling 2020 memoir, The Meaning of Mariah Carey.

In a ruling issued Monday and obtained by Rolling Stone, Justice Leslie A. Stroth of the New York State Supreme Court found that Morgan Carey failed to establish that his superstar sister acted with “actual malice” when making the statements he challenged.

Morgan claimed in his lawsuit that his sister had damaged his otherwise “excellent and spotless reputation” by portraying him as violent, accusing him of trafficking “powdered party favors” (a reference to cocaine), and describing him as having “behavioral problems” during childhood. He claimed Mariah had relied on their late mother as a source for some of the material and was more concerned with the memoir’s commercial success than with verifying the accuracy of her claims. He said his damages were “believed to exceed $20 million.”

But the judge found that Morgan could not establish actual malice simply by pointing to the deterioration of his relationship with his famous sibling. Under New York defamation law, public figures must show that a defendant made a false statement knowing it was false or with reckless disregard for the truth.

“Plaintiff has not sufficiently pleaded actual malice on the part of [Mariah],” Justice Stroth wrote. “Plaintiff fails to provide any proof that [Mariah] made such statements with knowledge of their falsity or with reckless disregard of their falsity or with reckless disregard for the truth. While plaintiff alleges that [Mariah] demonstrates ill will towards her brother, such statement is insufficient, and plaintiff has not satisfied the pleading requirement for actual malice.”

Trending Stories

In a statement to Billboard, Mariah’s lawyer, John Rosenberg, said that the singer “believes the importance of the Court’s decision goes well beyond her own interests in this particular litigation,” adding, “as it confirms that authors must be afforded broad protection when they speak out on matters of public concern.”

Morgan first filed his lawsuit on May 28, 2021. His lawyer tells Rolling Stone the fight is not over. “We respectfully disagree with today’s decision as being completely inconsistent with prior rulings in the case,” lawyer Richard Altman said in an email. “We intend to appeal it very soon.”

View the original on Rolling Stone →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.