ESPN49ers hold off furious Commanders' second-half rally to go 6-0ESPN DeportesMike Evans sale por lesión en el Commanders vs. 49ersThe Jerusalem PostMacklemore’s ‘Free Palestine’ tour will benefit group that called Oct. 7 a ‘prison break’Inquirer EntertainmentRuffa Gutierrez says mom Annabelle Rama ‘alive and kicking’ amid ‘false stories’ZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-Nachrichtenstudio中国新闻网以明晰程序稳定出口预期 持续提升出口管制效能NHK 社会東大の総長選めぐり 文部科学省が選考経緯の検証を要請Lenta.ruПодросток порезал российскую туристку в центре одного из популярнейших городов мираNew Straits TimesMalaysia's exports smash record with 34pct surge to RM1.57 trillionSRF NewsKrieg in der Ukraine – Trump: Haben der Ukraine viel gegeben – und sie uns nichtsRMF24Wschodnia Polska z ostrzeżeniem. Trwa kolejny atak na UkrainęLa NaciónSarmiento le ganaba a Barracas Central con un golazo, pero el VAR llamó al árbitro Zamora para anularlo
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Tuesday, October 20, 2026

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry did not agree to the Queen’s decision about their exit in 2020

Translate

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry did not agree to Queen Elizabeth’s decision over their royal exit; it was ‘decided and foisted upon them’

Meghan Markle and Prince Harrydid not agree to Queen Elizabeth's terms over their royal exit back in 2020, rather, according to recent reports, it was foisted upon them. (Instagram)

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, who stepped away from their royal duties in 2020 and moved to California soon after, reportedly did not agree to the entire situation that unfolded at the time.

According to recent reports, the late Queen Elizabeth’s decision to reject the “half in, half out” approach for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex was never fully accepted by the couple; rather, it was ‘foisted’ upon them. Read ahead to know more about the matter.

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry did not agree to Queen Elizabeth’s decision regarding the terms of their leaving

According to a recently published report by Hello!, it seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex did not have much of a say when it came to their decision to step back from their royal duties back in 2020.

A statement from the report read, “It doesn’t trouble them. They never agreed they wouldn’t be half in, half out. That was what was decided and foisted upon them.”They addressed that when the couple announced they would "step back as senior members of the royal family,” they did not entirely agree to the late queen's opposition to the “half in, half out” strategy. At the time, the monarch ruled that the approach could not be deemed acceptable since they would not be able to represent the monarchy while also having their own private and commercial interests.

Back in 2020, following the couple’s announcement, the royal family met to discuss the matter, which was termed the ‘Sandringham Summit.

'Another statement from the report added, “They’re just living their lives, and they can, because they’re financially independent.”

More about Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s return to the UK

After staying in Montecito, California, with their children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, the couple made the big shift to the UK after six years.

The two have returned to the UK and enrolled their children in a private school; however, their status as non-active members of the royal family has not changed.Soon after they moved back, King Charles issued a formal letter to the public confirming that neither Markle nor the prince will be considered active members of the royal family, and whatever charities or other events they attend are "a personal matter for them both and undertaken in their private capacity.

In short, their position is akin to private citizens with commercial and charitable interests.”

The two were recently seen together in Nottingham for their first joint appearance since the move. The two attended charitable events and even met with a crowd in the area. Nottingham is also a special place for the couple since this is one of the first places where the two stepped out in public together for the first time after announcing their engagement to the world.

View the original on Times of India Entertainment →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.