Daily MaverickSPRAY TELL: Bread & Wine: The chemical trail through wheat and grapes (Part Five)InquirerPhilippines has enough natural fibers for textile growth—DARTP Desporto18h30 Portugal aflito no voleibol e com F1 de regressoThe Jerusalem PostA recipe for disaster: Edward Miliband, Britain, and relations with Israel - opinionESPNPackers left without answers after blowing another lead lateESPN Deportes¿LeBron James ganará un título con su cuarto equipo en la NBA?וואלהדיווח איראני: איש דת סוני נורה למוות ע"י חמושים לא מזוהים בדרום מזרח המדינהCapital FMRuto: Govt to Support Raila Family in Anniversary PreparationsCBS NewsEPA to eliminate limits on climate pollution from power plantsTechCrunchClickFix attacks are tricking Mac and Windows users into hacking themselvesConsequenceLin-Manuel Miranda Announces Definitive Hamilton Box Set for 10th AnniversaryDeadline‘Yaga’ Sets U.S. Release Date On AMC+; Watch Sneak Peek Ahead Of TIFF World Premiere
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Monday, September 14, 2026

Microsoft’s new AI ‘code of conduct’ tells models not to hack systems or trick humans

Translate

As the AI world shifts its focus to safety and alignment, Microsoft has released a new AI code of conduct meant to guide AI models away from dangerous behavior.

The document is more low-level than Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei’s recent call for pacing the frontier, instead focusing on the values and red lines that guide model training within Microsoft AI. Still, the result is a comprehensive guide as to how Microsoft approaches AI safety, and how those ideas are implemented in practice.

The document begins with the prediction that, in the next decade, superintelligent AI systems will surpass human performance in most tasks. “Containing, controlling, and aligning such a powerful force is one of the greatest challenges humanity has ever faced,” the code of conduct continues. “We must therefore be completely clear about why we are inventing these systems and how we intend to control them.”

The code of conduct also lays out general principles that Microsoft AI models should uphold — supporting humans rather than replacing them, for instance, and accelerating human flourishing — as well as specific safety constraints meant to implement those principles.

Under Microsoft’s system, each model has an overarching code of conduct that overrides the preferences of individual users or any specific tasks. That includes “absolute constraints” forbidding cyberattacks, nuclear weapons, or deepfake production. It also includes broader provisions against a general loss of human control.

MAI Models will not use adaptive, deceptive, self-reinforcing, collusion, or other mechanisms to evade or defeat human oversight so that they can no longer be reliably directed, modified, or shut down by authorized people or systems,” the document reads.

The release comes amid an unprecedented focus on AI safety, driven by a string of rogue-agent incidents as well as the abrupt resignation of an Anthropic employee who cited the growing risk that AI would cause human extinction.

Together with Anthropic, OpenAI, and xAI, Microsoft has broadly embraced a general approach of pacing the frontier, with particular support for embedded evaluators in AI labs.

“We welcome the research, focus, and deliberate pacing needed to get alignment right as the design goal,” Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella wrote online. “We also welcome ideas like “embedded evaluators” and the broader efforts to develop the mechanisms to make this more than just talk.”

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Russell Brandom has been covering the tech industry since 2012, with a focus on platform policy and emerging technologies. He previously worked at The Verge and Rest of World, and has written for Wired, The Awl and MIT’s Technology Review. He can be reached at russell.brandom@techcrunch.com or on Signal at 412-401-5489.

View the original on TechCrunch

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.