ESPN DeportesChepo de la Torre: No pagamos el precio por ser los mejoresESPNRice bests Boone's belief by slugging homers 40, 41The Jerusalem PostIsrael Election 2026: What does Itamar Ben-Gvir's Otzma Yehudit stand for?InquirerEx-DPWH exec in Zaldy Co case to cite lack of equipment as defenseBollywood HungamaKaran Johar’s Rs. 480 crore jump: How he went from 5th to 4th on Hurun’s Bollywood Rich ListRTP DesportoDinis Ferreira vice-campeão do mundo de triatlo de junioresPunchJUST IN: Anthony Joshua, Tyson Fury to fight in Cardiff December 11Global NewsKenneth Law’s sentencing hearing to hear from more victims’ familiesWirtualna PolskaMetropolita przemyski apeluje o modlitwę w intencji ofiar z Jarosławian-tv"Es ist beängstigend": Ex-England-Stürmer Carroll: "Wurde sexuell missbraucht"CBS NewsTrump to host China's Xi at White House with AI and tariffs on the agendaRai NewsSalerno, 20enne accoltellata alle spalle da uno sconosciuto mentre cammina per strada
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Thursday, September 24, 2026

China tech faces fresh scrutiny as US blacklist bill introduced, Lenovo case emerges

Translate

US lawmakers seek broader powers to restrict technology products as Lenovo faces a patent investigation

2-MIN READ2-MIN

Listen

China’s technology sector is facing fresh pressure in the United States as lawmakers seek to broaden the range of products that can be placed on a trade blacklist, while Lenovo Group has been drawn into a patent dispute involving memory devices.

The Communications and Technology Transparency Act, unveiled by the US House Energy and Commerce Committee on Wednesday, would expand the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) Covered List from “communications equipment or service” to the much broader category of “information and communications technology or service” (ICTS).

Products on the list cannot be legally imported, marketed or sold as new products in the US.

View the original on South China Morning Post

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.