In 2007, Leonardo DiCaprio was sued for his 2005 custom basketball court

Leonardo DiCaprio was sued in 2007 for a basketball court he had built on his property, with his neighbours alleging that it compromised their home and pool's structural integrity. (Instagram)

The legal dispute between Leonardo DiCaprio and his Hollywood Hills neighbors, Ronald and Joan Linclau, centered around property damage claims and boundary disputes during home renovations.

The allegations began in 2007, when they sued the ‘One Battle After Another’ star, alleging that a series of renovations from 2004 had jeopardized the integrity of their home. At the center of it all was DiCaprio’s personal and custom basketball court.Read ahead to know more about the property dispute and what really happened.

In 2007, Leonardo DiCaprio was sued by his Hollywood Hills neighbors

In 2007, as TMZ reported, the Linclaus officially sued DiCaprio over damages that their property and their pool allegedly incurred because of one of the actor’s constructions.

At the center of it all was DiCaprio’s basketball court, which he had custom-built for his home in the Hollywood Hills in 2004. His neighbors complained about the matter in their suit, alleging that it had been built on illegally excavated land, which then stripped away vegetation and damaged their retaining wall.The allegations also stated that because of the construction work, their structural integrity had been affected and that their outdoor deck and swimming pool were at risk of collapsing.

They asked for USD 250,000 in damages. A statement from their case filing read that the actor "failed to exercise ordinary care ... in making the excavations and failed to take reasonable precautions to sustain the adjoining land .

.. in its natural state.”

Leonardo DiCaprio denied all claims

Soon after the lawsuit was filed against the actor, his legal team issued an official statement, denying all of the claims and allegations that his neighbors had made.

Instead, they argued that they wanted to shift all of the blame for structural issues that they had created for themselves. Cross-claims were also filed against several construction firms that had been involved in the project.The Hollywood Reporter shared that later, in 2008, Superior Court Judge Tricia Ann Bigelow ruled that a lot more proof was required from the Hollywood Hills residents to hold up their claims of structural integrity damage after DiCaprio’s construction.

The Linclaus were given 15 days to make amends for their complaint. A statement from the report read, “It seems to me that the complaint is still uncertain.” The judge further added, “I don’t think he cut down the trees; he’s probably busy doing some other things.

”

Leonardo DiCaprio reaches a private settlement with Ronald and Joan Linclau

After a two-year-long battle, the case was officially dismissed by the judge after both parties reached a private settlement out of court. Around June 2008, the court was then informed that both DiCaprio and Linclaus were working on a deal out of court. Later, after almost a year of modifications and contract reviews, the court records confirm the entire case was formally dismissed with prejudice. It was reported that the two had settled; the amount was never revealed to the public.