When we become too busy to think

We need only remember that efficiency is not wisdom, information is not understanding, and connectivity is not the same as human closeness. (Illustration: C R Sasikumar/File)
3 min readSep 24, 2026 06:12 AM IST First published on: Sep 24, 2026 at 06:12 AM IST
We have never had so much information at our fingertips. We know what is happening in distant wars almost as it happens. We can summon facts in seconds, communicate across continents, and organise our lives with extraordinary efficiency. Yet there is a curious paradox at the heart of all this abundance: The more information we consume, the less time we seem to have to think. Nearly sixty years ago, Martin Heidegger warned about the difference between merely calculating and genuinely thinking. Modern societies, he feared, were becoming extraordinarily good at planning, organising and controlling, while losing something quieter and more difficult: The capacity to reflect. His warning now feels uncannily familiar.
Much of contemporary life encourages reaction rather than reflection. A headline appears; we approve or condemn. A video goes viral; within minutes, thousands have passed judgement. Someone expresses an unfashionable opinion and is rapidly classified as enlightened or ignorant, friend or enemy. Before one question has been properly considered, another arrives. The danger is not simply that we may sometimes be wrong. It is that constant reaction that can gradually alter the way we see other human beings. When suffering reaches us continuously through our screens, compassion can become exhausted. War, poverty, cruelty, and disaster appear between advertisements and jokes. Inevitably, the mind protects itself. What initially horrified us becomes familiar. The stranger’s misfortune becomes another item to scroll past. Indifference grows quietly. And once we cease to attend carefully to people, it becomes easier to reduce them to categories: Religion, caste, nationality, ideology, political affiliation. The complicated human being disappears behind the label.
This is why thinking is not merely an intellectual accomplishment. It is also a moral act. To think seriously about another person requires us to resist instant judgement. It asks us to entertain the possibility that we may be mistaken; that someone with whom we disagree may nevertheless possess part of the truth; that another person’s suffering makes a claim upon us even when it is inconvenient. Religious traditions have different names for this discipline. Christianity speaks of attending to one’s neighbour. Buddhism cultivates mindful awareness and compassion. Hindu traditions have long valued contemplation and self-knowledge. Islam repeatedly calls the believer to reflection. Beneath their differences lies a surprisingly similar intuition: A life worth living requires more than activity. It requires attention. Perhaps that is what our hurried age most urgently needs.
We do not need to stop calculating or using the technologies that have transformed our lives. We need only remember that efficiency is not wisdom, information is not understanding, and connectivity is not the same as human closeness. Sometimes the most important thing we can do is also among the simplest: Resist the immediate response, remain with a difficult question a little longer, and look again at the person we were tempted to dismiss. For when we lose the habit of thinking deeply, we do not merely become less thoughtful. We risk becoming less human.
KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.