InquirerPangasinan towns revoke class suspensions for Teachers’ DayCNN TürkAvrupa panikte: Dünya ekonomisinin çarkını döndüren dizel alarm veriyorThe Jerusalem PostUS military strike kills four suspected narco-terrorists in Caribbean as campaign toll tops 220Bollywood HungamaJanhvi Kapoor condemns morphed AI video from Devara Part 1 song ‘Chuttumalle’: “Consent, choice and respect for a woman's body should be basic”PunchNew Army formations will strengthen response to insecurity — TinubuESPN😈 Cowboys' jab at Texans leads NFL Week 4 trollsDaily MaverickBOOK EXTRACT: My best friend, ED: Evolution of an eating disorder from childhood into adulthoodESPN DeportesWhittaker domina a Wallace y sobrevive a un cierre caóticoCapital FMGovt activates national response as El Niño rains approach KenyaZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFIl Fatto QuotidianoLa forza di un no!, ecco cosa emerge dal report pilota sulle vittime di matrimoni forzatiRTL BoulevardDries Roelvink leeft mee met liefdesverdriet van zoons
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Monday, October 5, 2026

Live Hearing: Supreme Court to hear pleas against CEC Gyanesh Kumar’s functioning

Translate

The petition filed before the Supreme Court questions the functioning of CEC Gyanesh Kumar.

Supreme Court Hears Plea on CEC Gyanesh Kumar Live Updates: The Supreme Court on Monday will hear petitions questioning the functioning of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, calling for an SIT probe against him and seeking to declare the nationwide SIR of electoral rolls illegal. A bench of CJI Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana will hear the matter.

The petitions were filed days after The Indian Express reported that ECs Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi had recorded objections at least 14 times over the past 10 months to decisions and orders concerning the SIR of electoral rolls. The two commissioners said some of the decisions were issued without their knowledge or recommendation. The two ECs separately wrote to the country’s top bureaucrat, Cabinet Secretary T V Somanathan, flagging concerns over the integrity of voter software. The ECI said the letters sent by Sandhu and Joshi to the Cabinet Secretary concerned an officer on deputation and were not related to policy or IT division matters.

Story continues below this ad

Pleas before court: One of the petitions by Patna resident Rakesh Kumar Singh referred to the alleged differences between CEC Kumar and Sandhu and Joshi and the objections raised by them. “Article 324(1) of the Constitution does not vest the superintendence, direction and control of elections in an individual Chief Election Commissioner. It vests those powers in a Commission,” said the plea. The petitioner urged the court to declare SIR, and all actions, decisions, directions, and measures taken under it, invalid from the very beginning and without legal authority. The petitioner argued that the SIR was undertaken without the necessary statutory or constitutional authority and without following the procedure required by law.

The other petition by Delhi-based lawyer Shailendra Mani Tripathi has sought a probe by an independent, high-powered judicial inquiry commission or an SIT headed by a retired judge of the top court. The petition refers to “unprecedented constitutional fractures and illegalities committed within the ECI under the CEC as exposed by documentary records published on September 23, 2026”. The plea said the alleged “act of… CEC Kumar… falls squarely outside the ambit of official immunity and constitutes distinct, personal criminal liability”.

View the original on The Indian Express →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.