ESPNWNBA playoff bracket coming into focus: Dream lock in 4-seed, Liberty are No. 8ESPN DeportesMexicana Bernal hace doblete en goleada del Manchester UnitedThe Jerusalem PostUkraine transfers two North Korean prisoners of war to South Korea, Zelensky saysPunchFCT truck driver, two others held for vandalising NNPC pipeline한겨레희귀질환 치료제 ‘100일 신속등재’ 시동…환자가 체감하는 제도 될 수 있을까? [건강한겨레]BillboardTame Impala, Genesis Owusu Lead 2026 ARIA Awards Nominations: Full ListUOLMediação no TST termina sem acordo, e greve na Caixa continuaAnime News NetworkLEGO Teases Dragon Ball SetsDaily NationJubilee factions fight for control ahead of delegates conventionNew Straits TimesFund our healthcare bodies before standards slip, private hospitals tell govtLenta.ruЭрдоган обсудил с Зеленским безопасность в Черном море中国新闻网华南师范大学成立科技商学院 深化科技与商学融合
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Thursday, September 24, 2026

China’s top priority should be wages, not AI

Translate

“Whoever wins with AI wins,” US President Donald Trump has declared, dismissing warnings about the risks of developing artificial intelligence too rapidly and citing rivalry with China.

The technological competition is real. China has reason to fear becoming dependent on America for advanced chips and AI technology, particularly as Washington has repeatedly restricted its access to cutting-edge semiconductors. China, meanwhile, is directing enormous resources towards AI. Stanford University’s 2026 AI Index estimates that Chinese government guidance funds deployed US$184 billion into AI-related companies between 2000 and 2023.

I am no technology expert. But as someone who spent 10 years greasing machine parts in a factory, I wonder whether China has got its priorities right. Should winning the AI race be such an overriding national ambition when the country has another pressing economic problem? Namely, ordinary Chinese people still have too little money in their pockets.

View the original on SCMP China

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.