“We Pay The Price” –Nadal Criticizes Hard Court Dominance, Tour Calendar
Free from the constraints of active competition, Rafael Nadal is taking aim at the modern tennis calendar and calling for radical structural reform.
The former World No. 1, who called time on his career in 2024, believes the current 52-week rolling ranking system places undue pressure on players to compete through injury.
Read Also:Flamingos’ World Cup Triumph Highlights Nigeria’s Wealth Of Football Talents – Akuneto
Instead, he is advocating for a two-year rolling window, a change he argues would grant athletes better schedule flexibility and adequate recovery time.
In an interview with the Associated Press, Nadal also described the ATP’s move to expand seven Masters 1000 events into 12-day marathons as a “mistake,” pointing out that the relentless schedule combined with hard-court dominance takes a massive physical toll.
“It was difficult for me to fight for that when I was on the tour,” Nadal admitted regarding the dominance of hard courts.
Read Also:AFCON 2027Q: Tanzania Storm Uyo For Super Eagles Showdown
“But now I can say: I don’t see a lot of professional sports playing on that kind of surfaces. That’s the truth.”
“In tennis, we’re playing most of the time on a surface that is very aggressive for the body and the joints,” he added. “And then we pay the price.”
Austin Akhilomen is a passionate sports content writer with a strong interest in football. He is a fan of the Super Eagles of Nigeria and Chelsea, and he enjoys following the teams, players, and competitions that make the sport exciting. Austin writes sports news, match reports, and football content to keep readers informed about the latest developments in the sporting world. His passion for sports also drives his aim to promote the game and connect football fans across the globe. Through his work with Complete Sports, Austin shares engaging sports content with readers and brings his love for football into every story he writes.
KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.