ESPN DeportesSigue en vivo – Dream no cede el paso y ya sueña con el Juego 7The Jerusalem PostPolymarket probes suspicious trades around Israel election, Bloomberg News reportsESPNWorld Series champs, at last! Milwaukee Brewers barrel their way to the topkickerLIVE! Hipp sorgt für Bremens Blitzstart nach der Pause - Dhont lässt zwei Chancen liegenEuronewsKazakhstan's Tokayev calls for faster construction of nuclear power plantsNU.nlDrie doden en twaalf gewonden bij crash Italiaanse legerhelikopter in BosniëEngadgetMeta will now alert parents if teens 'repeatedly' search for self-harm content on FacebookABC NewsTop general fired from Pentagon's Joint Staff for alleged classified info leakZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFCNN بالعربيةفانس يتهم المرشحة الديمقراطية ماري بيلتولا بمحاولة "تزوير انتخابي" في ألاسكاThe Hollywood Reporter‘The Cat in the Hat’ Is Back: How the Seuss Icon’s First Animated Feature Will Kick Off a New EraCBS NewsGuilty plea on federal charges in deadly Boulder firebomb attack
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Thursday, October 29, 2026

Palestinian parties could redraw Israel’s political landscape

Translate

Exit polls indicate that opposition leader Gadi Eisenkot would have to work with Arab-Israeli leaders to have a hope of governing

The big gains made by Palestinian parties in Israel’s general election pose an urgent and fundamental challenge to the country’s mainstream opposition: either cooperate with Arab Israelis or hand Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a roadmap to political survival.

In the wake of Tuesday’s exit polls, the leader of the opposition bloc, Gadi Eisenkot, declared them a victory for “Israel’s Zionist national majority,” but the real outcome looks as if it would be far more complex than that.

The greatest change between the new Knesset and the old would be the dramatically increased representation of Palestinian parties, which are projected to win 17 to 18 seats, up from 10. That redraws the battle lines on Israel’s political landscape. Arab Israelis would not so easily be sidelined and ignored.

The exit polls placed Eisenkot’s opposition bloc and Netanyahu’s governing coalition tied. Although the prime minister’s Likud party could still be the strongest single party, neither side has enough to get 61 seats in the 120-seat parliament for a majority.

If confirmed by actual results, that would give Israeli President, Isaac Herzog discretion over whom he asks first to try to form a government. If one candidate cannot succeed in six weeks, the challenge is passed on to the next option. It could be an extremely long process, and all this time Netanyahu’s coalition would stay on in a caretaker role.

Eisenkot could argue he has a chance of negotiating his way to a Knesset majority. However, to do so he and his partners in the “change” bloc would be obliged to sit down to talk with the Palestinian groupings, the Joint List and Ra’am (an acronym for the United Arab List). They would probably find Ra’am and its leader, Mansour Abbas, easier to talk to. Abbas has already participated in a right-leaning government of former Israeli prime minister Naftali Bennett, now a junior partner in the Eisenkot bloc. Abbas has a Jewish Zionist deputy, he has shown willingness to make political compromises and stated emphatically on Tuesday that his priority is to “bring down Benjamin Netanyahu, [Bezalel] Smotrich and [Itamar] Ben-Gvir in this election.”

However, most estimates based on the exit polls show Ra’am as the smaller of the two Palestinian groupings, with seven projected seats in the new Knesset and it is not clear that would be enough, even if a pact was made with the consent of the other members of Eisenkot’s bloc, to produce a majority government.

Negotiations with the Joint List, with 11 or more projected seats, would be tougher. Eisenkot has laid down four conditions: recognize Israel as a Jewish and democratic state, accept the values expressed in Israel’s declaration of independence, accept conscription for Palestinian-Israeli citizens, who are exempt, and denounce Hamas as a terrorist organization.

Speaking on Tuesday as the votes were being counted, Amjad Shbita, the general secretary of Hadash, the socialist party that is the biggest faction in the Joint List, said Eisenkot would be in no position to impose terms for coalition talks.

“Laying down conditions won’t work with the Joint List,” Shbita said. “We will negotiate as equals because we need each other.”

In the absence of an agreement with one or both of the Palestinian groupings, it is possible that Eisenkot could try to govern as a minority government, with informal vote-by-vote agreements that would keep the new coalition afloat.

It would be an unstable solution, making another election more than likely. That would provide Netanyahu the opportunity to rally support among conservative Israeli Jews and claim to have been vindicated in his campaign slogan, “the Right or Palestine,” which rhymes in Hebrew.

Netanyahu has looked beaten before over his three decades at or near the top, and staged a comeback each time with the aid of his unparalleled tactical skills as a dealmaker. No one is yet ruling out another breathtaking political escape, but this time, if he does bounce back, he would owe his resurrection to his avowed political enemies for dropping him a lifeline rather than make historic compromises across Israel’s deep racial divide.

Speaking from the Joint List victory party in Nazareth in the early hours of Wednesday, one party official said: “The Zionist opposition will have to choose between supremacy and building democracy.”

View the original on Taipei Times →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.