PunchPolice raid fake dollar factory, recover three bags of counterfeit notesالنهارشركة روسية للتجارة الإلكترونية تعلن تعرضها لهجوم بمسيّرةThe Jerusalem PostTrump says US has no immediate plans to strike Iran, ‘getting everything we want’ in negotiations한겨레갤럭시 버즈, 청력 검사·보완까지 해준다…내년 초부터 업데이트ZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFDaily MailDemocrats flip Senate battleground North Carolina in first major midterm scalp: Live updatesCBS NewsSenate election results as Democrats get three battleground victoriesGlobo EsporteInternacional x Coritiba - Campeonato Brasileiro 2026 - Ao vivo - globoesporte.comESPNNYC Marathon runner, 24, dies after collapsing 2 miles from finishThe Sydney Morning HeraldToo risky, too costly: AUKUS should be scrapped, finds Peter Garrett-led inquiryMalay MailWoman arrested over alleged harassment of visitors at Kuala Lumpur shopping mallBBC NewsUS voters name economy and state of democracy as top issues, poll says
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, November 4, 2026

Celebrity accused of 'inappropriate sexual activities' loses High Court bid to keep name secret

Translate

A celebrity has lost his bid for a High Court injunction against two media organisations to prevent the publication of allegations against him, a judge has ruled.

However the man cannot yet be named subject to any appeal.

The man brought legal action against Independent Television News (ITN), which produces news programmes for ITV, Channel 4, Good Morning Britain and Channel 5, and Guardian News and Media (GNM), publisher of The Guardian.

During a two-day trial in late October, the High Court in London was told by lawyers for the media organisations that the allegations they want to report involve the man’s alleged “abuse of power and status” to contact young women and try to engage in “inappropriate and exploitative sexual activities”.

The well-known man, who denies the claims, sought an injunction to prevent this broadcast and publication because of a risk that he would take his own life, following two previous suicide attempts.

In a judgment on Tuesday, Mr Justice Nicklin dismissed the injunction bid and said in a summary of his ruling: “The claimant’s claim for an injunction was dismissed.

“The court did not determine whether the allegations, or any of them, were true, and the dismissal of the claim does not amount to approval of any publication the defendants may decide to make.”

He added that the man will remain anonymous to allow any appeal bids to be lodged.

Sara Mansoori KC, for the unnamed man, previously said he denies the allegations of wrongdoing and that publication “would have a potentially fatal impact”.

She told the court: “The only reason they would not be fatal is because the claimant would be locked up and prevented from his desire to end his life.”

The barrister also said the claimant “has no intention of returning to public life”.

Gavin Millar KC, for ITN and GNM, said the case risks “dragging judges into assessing the causes of suicidal ideation, which are for professionals and not for a judge”.

He added: “The obligation falls on the hospital to keep him safe, and that’s that.”

He later said: “Plainly, the proposed publication would make a valuable contribution to a debate of public importance, about men using their power to be able to misconduct themselves against women in that area of society.”

* Samaritans can be contacted for free, day or night, 365 days a year, on 116 123, or visit samaritans.org to find your nearest branch.

View the original on Evening Standard →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.