The Jerusalem PostTurkey sending technical, defensive support to Saudi Arabia to help fight Houthis, officials sayESPNAre Texans and Chargers this bad? How should we bet the Rams?ESPN DeportesGurú de las Diagonales: El misterio en torno a Drake MayeBollywood HungamaSCOOP: Ramayana expected to have paid previews on November 4; Godzilla Minus Zero to get limited showcasing in IMAX in IndiaDaily MaverickLABOUR ABUSE: New report exposes the exploitation behind the world’s food systems workersInquirerMan nabbed after surrendering unlicensed firearm in Oriental MindoroZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioThe South AfricanSaleng spotted back in Sundowns training ahead of Pirates showdownBBC Sport'Draining' few days for Gauff after online racist abuse01netAmazon éclate le prix de ce PC portable Dell : -45% pour finir le Prime Day en beautéRai NewsCile, cane randagio salvato dalla piena del fiume MapochoSBS 뉴스"우리 대응에 북한 당황"…"지뢰 제거, 단호한 대응이냐"
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, October 7, 2026

Gauff says online abuse was ‘draining’ after China Open exit

Translate

Coco Gauff said online racist abuse had left her feeling exhausted after she went out of the China Open with her loss to Elise Mertens on Wednesday.

The American world number four, who is Black, turned in an uncharacteristically listless performance in Beijing, double-faulting eight times as she went down 6-3, 6-3 to her Belgian opponent.

Gauff, 22, was playing a day after she called out the “insane” amount of abuse she had received on the internet following her win over Chinese teenager Sun Xinran in the previous round.

“It has been kind of draining. I’m not going to lie,” Gauff said of the impact of the online comments.

“But I just turn off my phone and move on. There’s nothing you can do.”

Asked about the match, she said: “I think I just didn’t play well. I think I wasn’t moving well.

“There were a lot of things I didn’t do well. I thought Elise played well on the bigger points.”

During her previous match in Beijing, against Sun, Gauff requested a video review over flickering LED lights on the stadium’s advertising hoardings.

The move prompted some boos from the crowd. The umpire agreed to have the point replayed, and Gauff went on to win 7-5, 6-1.

Early on Tuesday, Gauff wrote on X: “Hey everyone, you can dislike me or disagree about what happened without being racist.”

She was responding to a post that contained a racial slur.

“The amount of racist comments and messages I’ve received in the last few hours is insane,” she wrote.

Gauff also clarified that she challenged the point before Sun had returned the ball, when she noticed the lights flicker for a second time.

Asked about the incident, a spokesperson for the Women’s Tennis Association, the global governing body, said it was “appalled by the racial abuse directed at Coco Gauff and are in contact with her to offer our full support”.

It added in a statement to AFP that there was “no place for racism, discrimination, or abuse in tennis”, and that it was “seeking action” against the abusive content.

Gauff, who won the Beijing title in 2024 and made the semi-finals last year, is a popular player among fans at the tournament itself.

A group of supporters in the largely empty stadium tried to encourage her into a comeback on Wednesday.

– ‘Tough match’ –

Mertens was undeterred as she punched her ticket for a quarter-final clash against Iga Swiatek.

The world number 19 called Gauff an “incredible player”, adding: “I knew it was going to be a very tough match”.

She dedicated her win to her coach, who is also her boyfriend.

Earlier, Swiatek swept aside American teenager Iva Jovic 6-1, 6-3 in one hour and 35 minutes.

“I had it under control from the beginning,” said the Polish world number nine. “I feel like I’m improving every day.”

China’s Zheng Qinwen is due to face 118th-ranked Alina Charaeva later on Wednesday.

Ukraine’s Elina Svitolina, the sixth seed, will play American Ann Li.

View the original on Vanguard →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.