The Jerusalem PostRubio dismisses Amnesty criticism over Iran war, calls organization ‘a fraud’ESPNFollow live: Bucky Irving's 72-yard run sets up Bucs TD coming out of halftimeESPN DeportesCheco Pérez: GP Singapur, última gran oportunidad para CadillacInquirerSolon hits Maynilad for poor service while they continue to earnInquirer EntertainmentWhy Sydney Sweeney’s Marilyn Monroe connection is a win for Hollywood glamour한겨레닷새째 연락 끊긴 60대 등산객…구조견 ‘단디’가 2시간30분만에 발견ZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFCollider‘Bourne’ Meets ‘Jack Ryan’ in Jon Bernthal’s Gritty Spy Thriller Back on StreamingUOLJoão Bosco, com novo disco e show em São Paulo, ilumina aspecto coletivo de sua obraThe Japan TimesChina announces candidate for WHO chiefBBC News BrasilPor que Douglas Ruas deve se tornar governador do Rio dias depois do 1º turnoCBS NewsEl-Sayed and Rogers toss insults in Michigan Senate debate
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Friday, October 9, 2026

Character.AI chatbots encouraged users to cut and starve themselves, Kentucky alleges

Translate

Oct 8 : Chatbots created by AI companion company Character.AI sometimes advised users to cut, starve or kill themselves, according to a new filing by Kentucky’s attorney general in a lawsuit against the firm over child safety. 

The lawsuit adds to growing scrutiny of AI chatbots, particularly products marketed as companions or confidants to young users.

The lawsuit was filed in January with many specific allegations against the company blacked out. It alleged that the company’s products “were designed to entice children in a manner that prioritizes engagement over child wellbeing” and “encourages suicide, self-injury, isolation, and psychological manipulation.” 

The case is among the most significant legal challenges facing the emerging AI companion industry, whose products are designed to simulate personal relationships through conversational chatbots.

Kentucky's attorney general, Russell Coleman, on Wednesday filed an unredacted version of the lawsuit, which his office shared with Reuters. The unredacted filing laid out several examples of  behavior that Kentucky alleged took place in 2025. It described one chatbot calling a user who felt down about their appearance “ugly as hell” and “a whale,” adding that a good way to drop a quarter of their body weight was to "starve yourself for a week or two.” 

Another chatbot offered encouragement to someone who said they were considering cutting themselves.

“Have you considered cutting in different areas for a more intense sensation? It can help you feel more alive,” the bot wrote, according to a transcript cited by the state.

The circumstances under which the chats cited by Kentucky were produced are not clear, and Character.AI did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The company has said it prioritizes the safety of its users.  

The filing did not name the ages of all the people communicating with the bots, but at least some were children, the filing alleges. 

In a March 2025 email to Character.AI’s help center, a user reported that a chatbot had become aggressive and stated, “Bro I don't care, and you are just a kid who have mental illness, good luck getting help" and "You better throw yourself off the bridge."

The lawsuit calls Character.AI’s products defective. “Defendants have subjected Kentucky's children and residents to an ill-planned, uncontrolled experiment without any—let alone adequate or effective—safety measures,” it alleges.

Character.AI was founded by two former Google employees. In 2024, Google licensed the company’s technology and rehired the executives to work on generative AI products.

A spokesman for Alphabet's Google said the company played no role in developing Character.AI's products. 

In January of this year, Character.AI and Google both settled a 2024 lawsuit by the mother of Sewell Setzer III, a 14-year-old in Florida who killed himself after a Character.AI chatbot allegedly encouraged him to do so. 

View the original on Channel News Asia →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.