ESPNMessi marks tearful Argentina farewell with goal: Wish I could play foreverInquirerPNP seizes P37.1M in smuggled cigarettes in MimaropaThe Jerusalem Post'The picture of manpower': IDF reports defense accomplishments three years into warPunchUS Army to execute Texas military base shooter by firing squadCNN Türk7 EKİM HAVA DURUMU TAHMİNLERİ: İl il hava durumu listesi! Meteoroloji'den toz taşınımı ve sağanak yağış uyarısı!RTP DesportoCarlos Padrão desdramatiza tensão entre Jesus e RonaldoUOLCalor extremo eleva risco de parto prematuro, mas gestantes estão fora de projetos de adaptação climáticaCNN بالعربيةدبي على خريطة الطهي العالمية.. أبرز ما جاء في دليل ميشلان 2026Wirtualna PolskaKto wygra w Krakowie? Gibała: Będzie na żyletkiIl Sole 24 OreVoto anticipato, nel centrodestra partita aperta ma il boccino è in mano a MeloniGMA NewsDOH monitoring reported 'plague' in Russia7sur7Mission accomplie pour Serge Pauwels et la Belgique? “Il y a dix ans, on aurait signé pour un tel bilan”
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, October 7, 2026

Beautiful butterflies get more attention from the public – and from scientists

Translate

Large and beautiful butterflies attract far more attention than species that are smaller and dull. Now a new study has shown that this bias towards beauty results in the boring butterflies being overlooked in conservation programmes.

To understand the link between beauty and conservation, researchers surveyed more than 21,000 people from more than 100 countries, asking them to look at photos of European butterflies and rate their beauty on a scale of 1 to 10 based on their first impression. The results, which are published in Current Biology, reveal that larger more colourful and patterned butterflies, like the yellow swallowtail, were consistently rated more attractive than the smaller, less conspicuous brownish species, such as the alpine grayling. That bias also extended into scientific research, with more studies on attractive species, and more funding and resource going into conservation of showier species.

By contrast, national and European red lists, which are based on fixed measurement criteria, do not exhibit the beauty bias. In fact, the most recent lists show that many of the small, brown, less attractive species are facing the greatest threat from climate breakdown.

The authors argue that nature conservation programmes need to recognise the beauty bias and give greater consideration to inconspicuous butterflies, which, while not as showy, play equally important functions within ecosystems.

View the original on The Guardian →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.