PunchPolice deny misconduct over viral video of suspect arrested in OyoRTP DesportoEstrela da Amadora supera Fazendense com `bis` de Tom MoustierESPNWeek 7 live: Richard TD run puts Indiana ahead of Ohio State in Big Ten showdownESPN DeportesHaaland se viste de héroe para darle el triunfo al City Premier LeagueThe Jerusalem PostEgypt's Sisi seeks parliament's backing to help defend Saudi Arabia if askedZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioVanguardTinubu scraps recruitment waiver for federal universities, strengthens autonomyColliderThe 6 Best Sci-Fi Books Released Since 2020, RankedSRF News«Wir haben die Schnauze voll» – Schwere Ausschreitungen bei frankreichweiten ProtestenPremium TimesGunmen kill four vigilantes in Plateau communityNOSPolitie houdt verdachte aan na explosie bij kapperszaak in VlaardingenInteriaZełenski traci nadzieję, mówi bez złudzeń. "Ta decyzja to dopiero początek"
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Saturday, October 17, 2026

Meta removes language that may have allowed it to scrape news sites

Translate

Language that experts say allowed the scraping of news sites to train its AI has been removed from Meta’s terms.

Language that experts say allowed the scraping of news sites to train its AI has been removed from Meta’s terms.

by

STK043_VRG_Illo_N_Barclay_2_Meta

Illustration by Nick Barclay / The Verge

Terrence O'Brien

is the Verge’s weekend editor. He’s covered the tech industry for over 18 years and knows a thing or two about synths.

After backlash, Meta is updating its terms again to remove language that suggested it could scrape content from sites, including news sites, to train its AI. Specifically, the following language no longer appears on the commercial terms page:

… Meta may use any content from such domains, web pages, or URLs to provide, develop, improve, research, train, and maintain the integrity of, the Meta Company Products, services, and features provided under these Commercial Terms and any other applicable supplemental terms.

Many, including Neiman Lab and James Grimmelmann, a professor of digital and information law at Cornell, interpreted it as an attempt to give Meta the right to use content scraped from sites to train its AI products for free and supersede blocking instructions in a site’s robots.txt file.

Andy Stone, Meta’s vice president of communications, and spokesperson Daniel Roberts pushed back, saying that “There is no change to how Meta uses web crawlers; any suggestion to the contrary is false.” Today’s update to its terms and a new statement go further, removing the controversial language entirely. Roberts said in a follow-up statement to The Verge this morning:

“We’ve heard you and want to clarify: the crawling terms we consolidated only applied to our ads and business products, and we’ve clarified that in the terms themselves. It does not change how Meta uses web crawlers. As always, content owners can use robots.txt to signal their preferences. This is not about scraping news sites, and these updates don’t give us new rights that supersede those preferences.”

Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.

View the original on The Verge →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.