Woman in Cornell rape allegations case targeted with threats, her lawyer says

Attorney says people have threatened to silence or harm ‘Jane Doe’ if she does not withdraw civil lawsuit

The woman who has alleged that ⁠she was drugged ⁠and raped ​by Cornell University students has been the target of threats, her lawyer said on Sunday.

Thomas Giuffra, who represents the ⁠woman identified as “Jane Doe”, told CNN that people have threatened to silence or harm her if she does not withdraw her civil lawsuit ⁠alleging that several members of a Cornell fraternity drugged and raped her in 2024.

“She’s ​received multiple threats,” Giuffra said on ‌CNN’s State of the Union.

Giuffra ‌said he had also been threatened.

“I’m not afraid of these people,” he ‌said. “But the threats, the abuse to protect what’s going on, the status quo – these guys are disgusting. They should stay in their mother’s basement and stay out of the world.“

The Cornell University president, Michael Kotlikoff, said in a video message on Saturday that the university will examine the role of fraternities and sororities on ‌campus after the outcry over the school’s handling of the rape allegations.

“At their best, these organizations can provide students with friendship, belonging, ​mentorship and a powerful sense of community,” he said. “But being part of a group can never diminish individual responsibility.”

Since the lawsuit was filed in September, prosecutors in Tompkins county, New York – where Cornell is – have been criticized for their initial handling of the allegations in 2024. ⁠The New York governor, Kathy Hochul, on Thursday named state attorney general ​Letitia James as special prosecutor ​to look into the case.

Donald Trump, a critic of James for years, lambasted ​the decision to ‌appoint her. “And I ​feel badly for whoever ​she’s looking at because they won’t get a fair shake,” the president told reporters on Friday.

Asked about Trump’s comment, Giuffra said the case shouldn’t be politicized. “It has nothing to do with politics,” Giuffra said.

In 30 days, our democracy faces a critical test…

With the midterm elections approaching, voters need fact-based reporting to decide the future of our country. Facing declining popularity, Donald Trump is accelerating his attacks on journalists’ First Amendment rights. Before you close this tab, can we ask you to support the Guardian at this critical time for journalism in the US?

The assault on the free press makes it more difficult to report on top election issues like the war in Iran, immigration enforcement, and AI’s potentially existential threat to humanity.

Most recently, Trump banned CNN, MS Now and Politico from the White House, in retaliation for “negative” coverage. While a federal judge has restored White House access for now, saying the ban is likely unconstitutional, Trump is still blocking CNN from Air Force One.

At the same time, Trump is using the FCC – which is supposed to be an independent regulator in the public interest – to settle political scores: The FCC targeted ABC after Jimmy Kimmel made a joke about the First Lady, and Trump suggested that the agency should punish the host of Meet the Press for making a  factual statement the president disliked.

The Pentagon, meanwhile, fired the editor of Stars and Stripes newspaper for “insubordination” shortly after they reported on a suicide attempt aboard the USS Lincoln, the Navy aircraft carrier reported to be in dire straits after 10 months at sea.

Making matters worse, many of the US’s largest news organizations are now owned by billionaires whose personal and business interests may imperil the outlets’ editorial independence. Media critics have observed how CBS News, now owned by a Trump ally, has softened its coverage; CNN could be taken over by the same billionaire; and Jeff Bezos has imposed extreme staff cuts and editorial interventions at the Washington Post.

When freedom is under attack, it falls to a determined few news organizations to ensure the full truth still reaches the public. The Guardian is owned neither by a billionaire nor a corporation and remains dedicated to keeping trustworthy journalism paywall-free for the world.

Despite the risks of maintaining our fierce independence, what sustains us – and fills us with deep gratitude – is the unwavering support we’ve seen from readers. A majority of our funding comes directly from readers. Your support not only powers our work, but more importantly, it safeguards the financial independence that underpins our editorial freedom and courage.

We know our requests for support are not as welcome as our journalism, but without them our journalism wouldn’t exist. Of course, we understand that some readers are not in a position to support us, and if that is you, we value your readership no less.

If you can, please support us today. We’re especially grateful for anyone able to set up a monthly contribution: reliable funding is vital for sustaining us throughout this dangerous period. It takes just 37 seconds to give. Thank you for protecting the free press.

Betsy Reed

Editor, Guardian US