וואלההתפרצות האבולה ברפובליקה הדמוקרטית של קונגו גבתה את חייהם של 2,325 בני אדםESPN DeportesAmérica golea a San Luis con gol de Diego ArriagaPunchRivers reconciliation: Wike allies, Fubara camp close ranksThe Jerusalem PostRapper ‘The Shadow’ removed as police volunteer amid investigationCNN Türk17 AĞUSTOS AKARYAKIT FİYATLARI: Benzin, motorin, LPG, akaryakıt fiyatları ne kadar? İstanbul, Ankara, İzmir akaryakıt fiyatlarında son durum...ESPNPitcher, surgery pioneer Tommy John dies at 83한겨레구글, 2분기 한국어 유튜브 채널 449개 폐쇄…“비정상적 활동 패턴”UOLDefensorias lançam fórum para atuar no Congresso, mirando orçamento e espaço nos tribunaisCBS NewsCBS News poll on whether Democrats split over socialismInfobaeKeiko Fujimori sobre simulacro de terremoto de 8,8: “Las cifras que me tocó leer, la verdad, eran terribles”El Comercio▷ Canales TV que transmiten Xolos de Tijuana vs. Cruz Azul EN VIVO EN DIRECTO por la Liga MX 2026New Straits TimesYen edges up as traders push back Fed rate hike bets
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Monday, August 17, 2026

Savarkar defamation case: SC quashes Lucknow Court order summoning Rahul

Translate

Savarkar defamation case: Supreme Court quashes Lucknow Court order summoning Rahul Gandhi

Rahul Gandhi gets relief as SC quashes summons

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday set aside a Lucknow trial court’s order summoning leader of opposition Rahul Gandhi in a criminal defamation case over his remarks about VD Savarkar.A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Sheel Nagu held that the required sanction had not been obtained in the matter."Additional Solicitor General and advocate for complainant, in the affidavit filed by UP, submits there is no disclosure of sanction. In such view of the matter, the complaint and orders passed by magistrate stands quashed," the bench said.The defamation case stems from Rahul Gandhi’s remarks about Savarkar during a rally in Maharashtra’s Akola district on November 17, 2022, held as part of his Bharat Jodo Yatra.On April 4, 2025, the Lucknow bench of the high court said Rahul Gandhi could file a revision petition before the sessions court, holding that its intervention was not required at that stage.The leader of opposition in the Lok Sabha had challenged the subordinate court’s order summoning him while contesting the ongoing proceedings in the case.

Satyaki Savarkar, VD Savarkar’s grandnephew, had filed a complaint against Rahul, alleging that during a speech in London in March 2023, the Congress leader claimed that V D Savarkar had written in a book about an incident in which he and five to six friends beat up a Muslim man and that he felt happy about it.

Satyaki Savarkar claimed that no such incident took place and that VD Savarkar had never written about any such episode. He sought Rahul Gandhi’s conviction under Section 500 of the IPC and compensation under Section 357 of the CrPC.The court had already granted bail to Rahul Gandhi in the case.

View the original on Times of India

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.