ESPNTransfer rumors, news: Arsenal could offer Endrick way out of Real MadridDaily MaverickINQUIRIES LAUNCHED: Top SA investigative journalist goes missing in DjiboutiESPN DeportesManchester City retoma la ventaja en casa ante Sunderlandוואלהרוכב אופנוע כבן 30 נהרג בתאונה בכביש 50 בירושליםPunchPHOTOS: Police raid FCT crime hotspots, arrest 300 suspectsThe Jerusalem PostOnly 17% of Israelis, 21% of Palestinians believe peaceful coexistence is possible, poll findsInquirerManila suspends in-person classes Sept. 21 over Martial Law anniv rallyRTP DesportoÀ conquista da Torre. Milhares de ciclistas em evento na CovilhãVanguardShettima leads Nigeria’s delegation to 81st UNGAColliderPierce Brosnan’s Best James Bond Movie Officially Makes Streaming ComebackSCMP ChinaRare earth exposure causes 3-fold increase of health risk to China’s newborns: studySouth China Morning PostTrump’s arch would be a ‘military complex’ hosting drones, snipers
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Sunday, September 20, 2026

Earl Spencer is 'picking at scars of the past' with his Diana memoir and 'can't bear' Charles and Camilla's popularity, Palace aides claim

Translate

Earl Spencer has been accused of 'picking at the scars of the past' with his tell-all memoir about Princess Diana and 'can't bear' Charles and Camilla's popularity, friends of the King have claimed. 

Buckingham Palace has been left reeling by a series of jaw-dropping extracts exclusively published by the Mail last week from the earl's hotly anticipated book Swan Song: Diana, My Sister.

Chief among the allegations is the eyebrow-raising claim that the then Prince Charles told Diana's grieving sibling days after her death in 1997: 'Rest assured, we'll forget her soon enough'.

It sparked an unprecedented rebuttal by the Palace, with a spokesperson questioning the veracity of Earl Spencer's explosive account and saying that fraternal grief can 'cloud reason, affect judgment and colour memory'.

Now, friends of the cancer-stricken 77-year-old monarch have hit back at the earl's 'unkind claims' and described him as 'one man picking at the scars of the past'. 

Charles was hosting an AI summit in Scotland when his former brother-in-law's continuous barbs were flowing.

And although he was said to be 'saddened' by 'sorrows of old being dragged up again', it was the 'future of mankind' that His Majesty was said to be more concerned with. 

The earl's reasoning behind the memoir 'to tell the truth about Diana' has also been scoffed at by a friend of the King. 

Earl Spencer is pictured being interviewed by the BBC's Laura Kuenssberg at his Althorp estate

King Charles III and Queen Camilla attend The Braemar Gathering on September 5, 2026 in Braemar, Scotland 

A series of jaw-dropping extracts from Earl Spencer's memoir about his late sister Diana is due to be published on Tuesday and is expected to rise up the bestsellers lists

'That's like an arsonist trying to sell you a fire hose and about as convincing as all those others close to Diana who've cashed in on her confidences over the years,' they told The Sunday Times.

'Why couldn't they all have just let her rest in peace? That would have been the decent thing to have done.' 

Earl Spencer's book is expected to climb the bestsellers list when it goes on sale on Tuesday, but the 62-year-old spoke exclusively to The Mail on Sunday to deny that he was motivated by money and said his late sister would be 'cheering from the rafters'. 

Those at the Palace appear to believe his motivation has been driven by his dislike of Charles and Camilla's popularity. 

One aide suggested to The Sunday Times that the earl has brought out 'the crested carving knives' as he 'can't bear' the 'fondness' towards the King and Queen from the British public and globally. 

'If I were to hazard a guess, I'd say it's more that, contrary to some public expectations and perhaps a few private hopes, the King and Queen have proved rather adept and popular in their new roles,' they said. 

Earl Spencer's incendiary claim that – days after Diana's 1997 death – the then Prince Charles told him: 'Rest assured, we'll forget her soon enough' provoked a highly unusual response from the Palace.

The Prince of Wales's alleged comment was made during a blistering row with the earl over whether Princes William and Harry, then aged 15 and 12, should walk in their mother's funeral procession. 

But in a statement, a Palace spokesman last week questioned the veracity of Earl Spencer's explosive account and said that fraternal grief can 'cloud reason, affect judgment and colour memory'.

Now, in his first newspaper comments since the war of words erupted, Earl Spencer has hit back, describing the Palace's statement as gaslighting, a form of psychological abuse where the victim is manipulated into questioning what they know to be true.

He also said the Palace's statement was a 'poor imitation' of Queen Elizabeth's famous 'recollections may vary' retort to Harry and Meghan after their interview with Oprah Winfrey in 2021.

'It is not every day you wake up to find you've been gaslit by the King,' he said.

'It was astonishingly provocative and below the belt because it was essentially trying to say I'd lied without the King being able to deny what I'd said.

'I also thought it was a rather poor imitation of the "recollections may vary" quote, which was a much more elegant way of putting things, but in these circumstances entirely out of place.'

The earl claims Charles told him days after Diana's death: 'Rest assured, we'll forget her soon enough.' The alleged comment was made during a row over whether William and Harry should walk in their mother's funeral procession

Earl Spencer and Charles are pictured during the official opening of a fountain built in memory of Diana, Princess of Wales, in London's Hyde Park in 2004

The then Prince Charles and Princess Diana are pictured visiting Venice during their trip to Italy on May 4 1985

In an interview with the BBC to be broadcast tonight, Earl Spencer said he told close friends and family 'straight away' about the Prince of Wales's alleged outburst 'because it was so monstrous'.

Writing in today's MoS, the Mail's Richard Kay – one of Diana's most trusted confidants – recalls Earl Spencer telling him, in the week before the Princess's funeral, that there had been a 'furious row' and that Prince Charles had been 'utterly pathetic'.

Earl Spencer last night said: 'I am a historian – I appreciate that a lot of the public don't know that – and my primary responsibility as a historian is to tell the truth. 

'My motivation in this book has been to tell the truth about Diana and all she had to put up with in her public life through the eyes of the brother who grew up with her.

'Along the way I've been able to deal with various myths that have grown up which needed to be dealt with once and for all. 

'I'm in my sixties, neither of my parents made it to 70 and I wanted to do this while I could.'

Some royal commentators have claimed the earl is 'cashing in' on his late sister's memory. 

Charles Spencer, however, strenuously denied that his motivations in publishing the book are financial.

'Money has never even been the remotest consideration in my choosing to write my tribute to Diana,' he said.

'Diana always had an expression which is don't judge others by yourselves – and I think this applies to anyone who accuses me of something so ridiculous.'

Former Tory MP Rory Stewart, who tutored Prince Harry and Prince William, told the BBC that he 'simply cannot believe' that the King said what Spencer claims. 

'It's just not his character, it's not his personality. Never ever have I heard him say anything like that,' he said.

In a statement released last Wednesday, the Palace said: 'While we do not comment on books as a matter of principle, His Majesty is mindful that the pain of fraternal grief can cloud reason, affect judgment and colour memory in ways others do not recognise, even many years after such a loss.'

The Palace has declined to comment on further claims in the memoir.

View the original on Daily Mail

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.