ESPN DeportesOtro interesante Monday Night ahora en ChicagoThe Jerusalem PostWhy is Karl Rove supporting a progressive Jewish candidate in Texas?ESPNYankees' Judge takes BP as push to play vs. Red Sox continuesInquirerIloilo transport alliance rejects people’s strike한겨레“만두 8개 먹고 털썩”…알레르기 쇼크 시민 구한 신속 대응中国新闻网“一根丝”拉动整条产业链 前8个月工业利润“黑马”是它CNN TürkBUDO'nun 8 seferi olumsuz hava koşulları nedeniyle iptal edildi매일경제가입하자마자 이자 들어온다…케이뱅크, ‘내맘대로 이자받는 정기예금’ 출시The Japan TimesBoeing 737 Max 10 approval delayed over new software issueChannel News AsiaPope says concerns about AI 'should be taken seriously'ABC NewsWATCH: Video shows woman's terrifying rescue from rough surf in the BahamasRapplerLIVE UPDATES: Impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Tuesday, September 29, 2026

New device captures carbon dioxide by pumping it across a battery

Translate

A photo with all the components of the device laid out side by side.

A small lab-scale cell with all the components laid out. The inlet and outlet ports carry the flow of gas interacting with the cell.

Credit: Buchen, et al./Nature Energy

A small lab-scale cell with all the components laid out. The inlet and outlet ports carry the flow of gas interacting with the cell. Credit: Buchen, et al./Nature Energy

The researchers tested a lab-scale device made of nine cells stacked together, each with an area of about half a letter-sized sheet of paper. A blower pushed air through sinuous air channels in the plates sandwiching each cell together (using components borrowed from fuel cells).

This small device used electricity at a rate of about 0.8 megawatt-hours per ton of captured CO2. Current facilities capturing carbon from ambient air are in the neighborhood of 1.5 to 3 megawatt-hours per ton of CO2.

Piloting the process

Several of the researchers on the team are part of a startup called RepAir Carbon that is based on this technology, and part of the paper is spent on sketching out financial feasibility at scale.

Estimating the cost for an initial small pilot plant (about $566 per ton of captured CO2), they use the learning rate from the lithium-ion battery industry and some common cost scaling for bigger plants to project forward a couple of pilot generations. For a plant with a thousand times the capacity of their pilot, they estimate they could get to $92 per ton of captured CO2.

That would be much cheaper than has so far been achieved by companies like Climeworks, which is aiming to get down to $250–$350 per ton by 2030—and has demonstrated how difficult it can be to meet optimistic scaling projections.

Targeting $100 per ton has long been the goal in the carbon-capture world, as costs that low could spur much wider adoption. Adding to the number of technologies being pursued may improve the odds that one of them reaches that goal.

Nature Energy, 2026. DOI: 10.1038/s41560-026-02129-z (About DOIs).

View the original on Ars Technica →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.