The Jerusalem PostUS-Israel ties deserve transparency before elections, not after - editorialPunchUS midterms: Democrats retake House, gain Senate seatsInquirerSt. Luke’s Medical Center reports personal data breachDaily MaverickBOOK EXCERPT: Scorpio Rising — The latest thriller from SA’s master of crime fiction한겨레시·영화·다큐 경계 허문 미국 실험영화 거장 린 삭스 첫 내한Inquirer Entertainment‘Crazy Rich Asians’ series opens global casting call for Asian men, womenESPN CricinfoMeghalaya infighting: Ranji squad sacked, new players selected following court orderCapital FMDemocrats Make Historic Gains in US Midterms, Win Senate and Take Control of CongressCNN TürkReal Madrid'de AEK maçı öncesi Arda Güler şokuZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioScreen RantSeven Of Nine Officially Goes Full Borg In Star Trek: Federation FleetDaily MailDemocrats flip JD Vance's old Senate seat blue in major Ohio upset stripping away Trump's power
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, November 4, 2026

Uber pays its drivers ‘wages’ and is liable for $81m payroll tax bill, Australia’s high court rules

Translate

The rideshare behemoth Uber has suffered a bruising loss in Australia’s high court that will cost it more than $80m in unpaid taxes.

The court on Wednesday dismissed Uber’s claim it was not liable to pay payroll tax in New South Wales after it argued that it does not employ drivers and claimed that money paid to its drivers were not wages under state law.

In a six-to-one decision, the high court found that Uber is liable to pay $81m for the tax years from 2015 to 2020.

But the ruling is likely to leave the multinational with a significant bill for subsequent years, pushing the total well over $100m.

Uber was initially successful in appealing against the NSW chief commissioner of state revenue’s assessment but Wednesday’s ruling spells the end of the company’s legal avenues.

Six of seven justices agreed to dismiss the high court appeal, saying Uber’s drivers were employees and the money paid to them was wages.

“Uber has structured its rideshare system business so payments from riders are funnelled through it,” the majority said in the judgment.

“That gives Uber substantive control over the fares before they are remitted to drivers, allowing Uber to deduct its service fee, or change or cancel the fare entirely.”

Chief Justice Stephen Gageler noted that payroll tax laws had been adjusted late in the last century in multiple states to capture more revenue from contractual arrangements meant to disguise the true nature of the working relationship.

“The contractor provisions … have continued ‘always speaking in the present’ to participants in the gig economy which emerged in this century,” the chief justice wrote.

Last year the legal expert Celeste Black wrote that the case would probably influence the payroll tax obligations of companies with gig workers across Australia.

The NSW government said payroll tax was a key part of state’s tax base, despite only about one in 20 companies meeting the threshold to pay it.

“It helps fund essential services that families and households rely on,” the NSW finance minister, Courtney Houssos, said on Wednesday.

“Local businesses pay their fair share. Uber should pay their fair share too.”

View the original on The Guardian Australia →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.