ESPN DeportesEl clásico de Manchester quedó definido por el VAR; silbidos para Real Madrid; Chelsea fue superado por HullInquirerDILG chief Remulla visits QC jail ahead of looming Romualdez transferThe Jerusalem PostA good deal in bad neighborhoods: Why the Gulf’s best bet remains in Jerusalem - opinionESPNPower Rankings: Everything we learned from the top 25 in Week 2RTP DesportoEuroVolley 2026. Portugal soma quarta derrota consecutiva frente à UcrâniaBBC NewsI had 11 years of chemotherapy for a cancer I didn't have20 MinutenUrsache unklar: Fischsterben im MühlebachComplete SportsBlackburn Give Injury Update On Super Eagles StarESPN CricinfoFleming to link up with T20I squad in preparation for Test coaching stintBBC عربيجماعة أنصار الله تعلن استهداف قاعدة ثانية في السعودية، ومحمد بن سلمان يلتقي قائد القيادة المركزية الأمريكيةIl Fatto QuotidianoKimi Antonelli ora ha in mano il titolo di Formula 1: quel vantaggio su Russell e il sogno di una passerella trionfaleABC News4 people hospitalized after a crane collapsed at a Miami construction site: Officials
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Monday, September 14, 2026

A New List Suggests the Most Influential Creators Aren’t the Ones You Expect

Translate

What if the most well-known creators aren’t the most influential?

A new creator Affinity List list from media executive turned “media cartographer” Evan Shapiro and What’s Trending founder Shira Lazar explore that very idea.

The list, which was sponsored by global creator company Whalar Group and its digital operating system Foam, was previewed by Shapiro and Lazar over the weekend at IBC 2026 in Amsterdam, but The Hollywood Reporter has the full list below.

While there are plenty of familiar names (MrBeast is 85, Charli D’Amelio is 100, Mark Rober is 90) the top of the list is filled with creators that have much smaller — but also much more engaged — audiences.

Author, educator and “Smarter In Seconds” creator Blair Imani is No. 1, while baker and cookbook author B. Dylan Hollis is No. 2. Another baker, Ash Baber, is No. 3, with De’arra Taylor and Speedy Morman rounding out the top five.

“What frustrates creators with all these lists is that the same types of people are on these lists,” says Lazar in an interview. “For certain lists it’s about money, for other lists it’s about followers. But we know influence comes in so many different ways. And so the idea of going deeper versus wider in terms of our affinity quotient and really being able to gauge influence in a different way was important to look at the ecosystem in a different way.

“We can believe we can show why they’re impactful, and if you look at their various careers, how the monetization would look for what’s called a macro creator or a nano creator,” adds Shapiro. “Nano creators have three times the reaction, three times the response rate of macro creators. That’s why three quarters of brands and agencies now prefer to work with nano and micro creators versus the macro creators because the impact, the reaction, and the response is great.”

The goal is to demonstrate how scale and size are not necessarily the best indicator of influence at a moment when the creator ecosystem is being disrupted alongside legacy media. It’s a world where views and revenue are secondary to other metrics. Shapiro explains the list in a Substack post, with Lazar digging into it through her What’s Trending brand.

“Shira and my team worked together to create a rubric where shares and likes and comments are weighted and added together,” Shapiro explains, touting Foam’s data and compute power. “Shares are weighted twice because we believe that they have a higher propensity for fandom.”

“My hope for creators is that they see this list and they see that if I’m an emerging creator, there’s so much possibility and opportunity for me in this new and growing and evolving landscape,” Lazar says. “I do believe again that a lot of big creators look at these lists and it’s the same names, and I think there’s going to be a really big respect and understanding that we looked at it in the way that I think creators look at their work and careers.”

At the end of the day, of course, the list is for brands, marketers, creator businesses and other media professionals looking to understand the current landscape.

“If you have a brand that you’re looking to get out there, I think look at the engagement of the creators on this list, and look at the cost per impression that you’re going to wind up putting into this, and the amount of money you’re going to have to boost that content afterwards to get the reaction that you need,” says Shapiro. “We do want to help these folks find new brand partnerships, but we also want to help agencies and brand partners do their homework, and we think this is a better way to gauge success.

“I think for brands and media companies that are now coming into the space and putting on their creator mindset hat, I think it’s important for them to see the the spectrum of creators and all the different types of creators that they can work with and that have power and influence in a different way than maybe they thought,” adds Lazar. “So those people should be getting more types of opportunities, not just the 1%. We can’t build this industry on the 1%, I’m just very passionate about that.”

View the original on The Hollywood Reporter

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.