The Jerusalem PostTrump's advisers optimistic of working with Netanyahu's rivals if he loses next election - reportESPN DeportesMourinho responde a Fermín y no da pistas vs. el BarçaESPNNFL Week 7 uniforms: Texans' battle red, Lions' all-black top alternate heavy slateRTP DesportoRicardo Coelho campeão mundial C1 de maratonaInquirerTesda chief denies P5-M ‘allocation fund’ offer to Lacsonالشرقسقوط شظايا إثر اعتراض صاروخين أطلقهما الحوثيون باتجاه مكة والمدينةynetלמה גדיCNN بالعربيةالسعودية تعلن سقوط شظايا صواريخ حوثية فوق مكة والمدينةVanguardNigeria-Indonesia investment to boost GDP, create jobs, says NICCI president, BalogunIranWireخبرگزاری فارس از دیدار محسنی اژه‌ای با مجتبی خامنه‌ای خبر دادPremium TimesAPC Rally: Tinubu speaks on second term ambition, promises prosperity, developmentZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDF
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Saturday, October 24, 2026

GH¢49.72m S.A. evacuation: Some evacuees didn’t receive reintegration and transport allowance – JoyNews Research

Translate

JoyNews Research has found that some of the 1,964 Ghanaians evacuated from South Africa did not receive their GH¢5,000 reintegration allowance and GH¢500 transport allowance, despite the government spending GH¢49.72 million on the exercise.

Head of Research at JoyNews, Isaac Kofi Adjei, disclosed this on JoyNews Newsfile on Saturday, October 24, while outlining findings from the team’s independent analysis of data relating to the evacuation.

He said the team’s checks also uncovered duplicate names in the records, payments without signatures and expenditure for which supporting receipts were unavailable.

“So after our independent analysis, we built a system to actually test this data. We manually also checked all the numbers that we had received and we came out with at least five conclusions that the data that we had did not support so many claims that were made by the Foreign Affairs Minister,” he said.

Mr Adjei explained that the team tested the list of 1,964 evacuees subsequently shared by the Foreign Affairs Minister and found discrepancies in the records it had analysed.

“When we did our checks, we realised there were duplicates in terms of names in the document that we had received and we had analysed. We also saw that some of the evacuees received monies, but there were no signatures.

"And there were those who did not receive the 5,000 resettlement allowance or reintegration allowance and the 500 cedis transport allowance,” he said.

The findings also included records containing dates of birth that appeared to be in the future or were otherwise impossible.

Mr Adjei said the Foreign Affairs Ministry or Ghana’s mission in Pretoria subsequently provided clarification on that issue.

Another concern was the absence of receipts for some expenditure items included in the government’s response to Parliament and in data obtained by JoyNews Research.

Mr Adjei cited accommodation and transportation expenses incurred in South Africa as examples of expenditure for which the team had not received receipts.

“We also have transport expenses in South Africa; we didn't have receipts for that and other expenses,” he said.

He stressed that the findings emerged from the team’s initial checks of the data obtained from its sources, adding that JoyNews Research had also examined data collected directly by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs during the evacuation.

“And I think subsequently we were finished with the primary data if I should say that or the original data that the ministry itself collected on the day. We have done that check as well. And Monday we are airing the findings here on Joy News,” he said.

Add MyJoyOnline as a preferred source on GoogleSee more of our stories when you search on Google. (opens in a new tab)

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.

Tags:  

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.

View the original on MyJoyOnline →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.