CNN TürkGalatasaray’da Osimhen planı netleşti: Dönüş maçı belli olduPunchNiDCOM defends response as Nigerians demand release of India detaineesThe Jerusalem PostTurkey unearths rare statues of Roman Emperor Hadrian, Empress Sabina in ancient Mediterranean cityDaily MaverickThe man with ‘no filter’: The second coming of Pitso Mosimane to Bafana BafanaInquirerFinal day of 2026 bar exams kicks offUOLFachin tira Mendonça e vira relator do caso Moraes e VorcaroColliderPokémon Officially Gives One of Its Most Iconic Monsters a Bizarre New LookSouth China Morning PostChina Porsche owner covers car with 90 missing-child flyers, successfully reuniting a familySCMP ChinaChinese scientists develop new oil refining method that may cut energy use by 90%Rappler[OPINION] 2026 BARMM parliamentary elections under the shadow of resurgent extremismBusiness AMVerkiezingssucces AfD bedreigt geplande economische hervormingen in DuitslandkickerGroße Vision, schmaler Grat: Wie weit sind die Skyliners wirklich?
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Sunday, September 13, 2026

IMPPA issues clarification over ‘incorrect’ interpretation of Bombay High Court order

Translate

The Indian Motion Picture Producers’ Association (IMPPA) has issued a clarification regarding what it described as incorrect interpretations of a recent order passed by the Bombay High Court in connection with a dispute between Saffron Magicworks Private Limited (owned by Nikhil Dwivedi) and Andolan Films Private Limited (owned by Vikramaditya Motwane). IMPPA has also been impleaded in the proceedings.

According to the association, certain communications and news reports currently in circulation have presented an inaccurate understanding of the scope and effect of the High Court’s order. IMPPA stated that its involvement in the matter was limited to carrying out its institutional responsibilities under its Memorandum and Articles of Association.

The association explained that the dispute between Saffron Magicworks Private Limited and Andolan Films Private Limited had been placed before IMPPA’s Dispute Resolution Committee. Any determination or direction issued by the committee, it clarified, was related to the parties involved in the dispute and the specific issues that had been brought before it.

IMPPA further stressed that it has no independent commercial claim or interest in the underlying dispute between the two companies. The association also urged that the High Court’s order should be understood strictly on the basis of its express terms.

Addressing reports suggesting restrictions on its functioning, IMPPA clarified, “No blanket restraining order has been passed against IMPPA restraining the discharge of its institutional functions.” The association said that some reports presently being circulated do not accurately reflect the order’s scope or its implications for IMPPA.

IMPPA also stated that it does not accept any characterization of the court order that goes beyond what has been expressly stated by the High Court. The association maintained that it will continue to carry out its responsibilities in accordance with applicable law, its governing framework and the directions issued by the court.

The clarification comes amid reports and communications surrounding the legal dispute involving Saffron Magicworks and Andolan Films. Through its statement, IMPPA has sought to distinguish its institutional role from the commercial dispute between the two parties and clarify the extent of the court’s directions concerning the association.

Also Read : BREAKING: Nikhil Dwivedi’s Saffron Magicworks secures a Bombay High Court restraining order against IMPPA

Tags : , , , , , , , , , ,

BOLLYWOOD NEWS - LIVE UPDATES

Catch us for latest Bollywood News, New Bollywood Movies update, Box office collection, New Movies Release , Bollywood News Hindi, Entertainment News, Bollywood Live News Today & Upcoming Movies 2026 and stay updated with latest hindi movies only on Bollywood Hungama.

View the original on Bollywood Hungama

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.