וואלההחות'ים: "תקפנו בית זיקוק סעודי ללא אישור"The Jerusalem PostEmbassy warns Britain of 'consequences' for providing drones to Ukraine used to attack RussiaRTP DesportoPor 35,9 milhões de euros. Amar Dedic troca o Benfica pelo NewcastleBollywood HungamaEXCLUSIVE: Excel Entertainment teaming up with Kanika Dhillon for an intense thrillerInquirer EntertainmentAnne Curtis assures she’s ok amid concerns over lump on her neckInquirerNCR wage hike: SC urged to intervene after Pasig RTC extends suspensionDaily MaverickWilliams sisters beaten on doubles return at Cincinnati OpenUOLAliados reagem a Trump e defendem exercícios militares com EUA diante da ameaça da Coreia do NorteSky TG24Prezzo diesel oggi, bruciato il taglio accise: torna ai livelli pre-decretoNMEEllie Goulding sues former managers over Live Nation “conflict of interests”Wirtualna Polska"Wie, co ma robić". Czarzasty o wątpliwościach wokół posła GomołyVanguardOsun people shouldn’t feel betrayed by Adeleke’s endorsement of Tinubu — Aide
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Tuesday, August 18, 2026

'Going Overboard': Rs 5 Lakh Fine On Maharashtra Food Body For Not Restoring Pune Shop's License

Translate

The Bombay High Court on Monday directed the Maharashtra FDA to pay Rs 5 lakh compensation to a Pune-based sweets shop for keeping its license suspended despite a 98 per cent compliance report and causing losses, noting the regulator's intent is laudable, but it's going "overboard".

A bench of Acting Chief Justice Ravindra Ghuge and Justice Gautam Ankhad said the Food and Drug Administration's order suspending licenses of eateries and hotels was a "strange policy and perverse".

Meanwhile, FDA Commissioner Tukaram Mundhe told PTI that he would examine the order before responding.

The shop, Gurunanak Dairy and Sweets, had challenged the FDA's action in the high court and said it had lost Rs 8.74 lakh in revenue since its closure in June.

The bench, while permitting the shop to reopen its business, ordered the department to pay the owners Rs 5 lakh compensation within a month.

"We have observed that your intention is laudable and some department has at least stood up. But you are going overboard. You should have immediately revoked the suspension of the license once you noticed 98 per cent compliance (in the re-inspection report)," the bench said.

The petition stated that a food safety officer from the FDA inspected the shop premises on June 12 following a complaint of food poisoning, and raised concerns over sanitation and staff hygiene. The same day, the department passed an order suspending the shop's license.

The shop filed an appeal before the FDA Commissioner and also submitted a compliance report.

On July 13, a re-inspection was carried out, and the shop was found to be 98 per cent compliant, but the license was not restored.

The shop owners then submitted a representation to the FDA seeking revocation of the suspension order, but no action was taken, following which they moved the High Court.

Mundhe said he would examine the order before responding.

"I have to see the order, then I will respond. FDA would act according to the law and prescribed processes. We go as per the law, as per the processes, we follow it, and we implement it,” he added. 

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

View the original on NDTV

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.