InquirerWATCH: Sara Duterte impeachment trial | Oct. 1, 2026CNN TürkTrump’tan dizel ihracatına yasak sinyali: Benzin fiyatları artabilirThe Jerusalem PostRubio orders Iran UNGA delegation to leave United States following stalled negotiations - reportPunchNigeria @66: Tinubu admits economic hardship, pledges to defeat povertyRTP DesportoCristiano Ronaldo deixa a Seleção NacionalBollywood HungamaAlia Bhatt joins Rami Malek, Sachin Tendulkar and Simone Ashley for a star-studded Earthshot Prize 2026 night in MumbaiХабрТеплицы на автопилоте: свет, шторы и вентиляцияSözcüSchengen ülkesinden bu Türklere vize kolaylığı: Başvurdukları gibi alacaklarSCMP ChinaMaxwell smart: new Chinese embodied model tops global AI ranking on physical tasksDaily MaverickESCAPE: Bangkok, a fever dream in neon and sepia, feeds hungry soulsThe Hollywood ReporterNetflix Spain Adds Films and Docs Curated by Streamer FilminVarietyGarin Nugroho, Mishima Yukiko, Qiu Jiongjiong Titles Among 15 in Tokyo Film Festival Competition
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Thursday, October 1, 2026

Ben Affleck Used AI “For Lots of Things” in His New Netflix Movie ‘Animals’

Translate

Ben Affleck used AI “for lots of things” in his upcoming Netflix thriller Animals, he said Wednesday at Bloomberg‘s 2026 Screentime event. Not that he’s going to tell you which things.

“I used [AI] for lots of things in that movie. I’m a little bit hesitant to point out what they are — or even talk about it — because in my business, we’re trying to foster the illusion of reality, right?” he told Bloomberg reporter Lucas Shaw. “It’s sort of like if you went to a magic show and the magician walked out and said, ‘Just before I start, I want you to know there’s another bunny under here. (And] this guy’s a plant.’ You know, it’s sort of ruined, right? But yes, we did use it, and in fact, I thought it was a good example (of how to use AI ethically) because it’s a very human movie.”

Other humans in the movie include Gillian Anderson, Steven Yuen and Kerry Washington; Animals premieres on Netflix on Oct. 9.

At this point, Affleck and Netflix are deep in bed together when it comes to AI. Affleck sold the streamer his AI company InterPositive for nearly $600 million, so he’s much more bullish on the technology than your average Hollywood heavyweight. Of course, his knowledge of the tech is far greater than the average actor/director.

Affleck said that once his fellow filmmakers “sit with” AI and gain “a sense of control… it moves from this nebulous, abstract, terrifying alien — you know, ‘It’s going to kill us all,’ all this propaganda — and they actually see what it is,” everyone chills out. “It’s another form of computing… and is a technological advancement that’s really in keeping with the longstanding series of technological improvements we’ve made in the film and television business.”

Affleck further stated that he doesn’t believe AI will ever provide the ability to “type-it-in-and-make-a-movie-that-people-want-to-see.”

Also during the conversation, Affleck dispelled the notion that Netflix made him and Matt Damon restate the plot of their movie The Rip every few minutes. Affleck says he and Damon went on Joe Rogan’s podcast to explain that their experience with the streaming giant “was utterly contrary” to the quote that went viral.

“Somebody went ahead and did a pull quote, and it got picked up once, and it was, ‘Matt Damon says Netflix makes you tell the plot in the first five minutes,'” Affleck said. “If you just stop and think about it— I’m in this movie. I’m directing. Even if that were true, do you think I would go on Joe Rogan and be like, ‘They made me put all this obvious shit in my movie’? Like, it doesn’t even make sense.”

“They would never do that,” he continued. “I don’t know that I’ve never met anyone who’s had a note that idiotic and brazen — and I’ve heard of a lot of idiotic studio notes. Idiotic studio notes long predate Netflix. This is a business with a long history of executives telling you to do the exact wrong thing that’s going to ruin your movie.”

View the original on The Hollywood Reporter →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.