ESPN DeportesLeón venció al Atlético de San Luis con doblete de CambindoESPNJudge hits 1st HR since May as Yankees clinch record 61st postseason spotCNN TürkFatih'te daha önce kurşunlanan iş yerinin fotoğraflarını çeken şüpheli tutuklandıPunchRansom economy: How kidnappers turn northern families’ pain into profitוואלהגבר כבן 70 נפצע קשה באשקלוןInquirerLOOK: DILG releases new mugshots of RomualdezUOLParte do Vale do Silício vê interesse comercial por trás de discurso de segurança e desaceleração da IAالشرقالمحكمة العليا ترفض خطة ترمب للحد من التصويت بالبريد في انتخابات التجديد النصفيNew Straits TimesCar crashes into elephant on Jalan Jerangau-Jabor, 3 people injuredThe Hollywood Reporter‘The Pitt’ Showrunner R. Scott Gemmill Delivers Rallying Cry for “What’s Real” After Emmy WinDaily MailEmmy Awards 2026 best dressed! Zendaya, Selena Gomez and Mariska Hargitay lead red carpet glamour at TV's biggest nightThe GuardianEmmy awards 2026 live: The Pitt wins best drama as Widow’s Bay cleans up comedy categories
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Tuesday, September 15, 2026

US Supreme Court deals blow to Trump’s mail-in voting restrictions ahead of midterms

Translate
Only two of the six conservative justices on the nine-member panel offered a dissent. — AFP pic

Only two of the six conservative justices on the nine-member panel offered a dissent. — AFP pic

First Published: Tuesday, 15 Sep 2026 9:17 AM MYT

WASHINGTON, Sept 15 —The US Supreme Court dealt a major blow yesterday to President Donald Trump’s attempts to restrict mail-in voting before the November midterm elections, denying his request to lift an order halting the divisive plan.

Only two of the six conservative justices on the nine-member panel offered a dissent.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh, in a concurring opinion with the majority, said Trump’s plan may ultimately be legal in the long run, but “state and local election officials do not have sufficient time to reasonably implement the rule before the elections.”

Trump signed an executive order in March seeking to restrict mail-in voting, saying without evidence that it is vulnerable to fraud. The order quickly prompted multiple legal challenges.

Democratic-led states sued the administration on grounds that under the US Constitution, states—and not the federal government—retain broad control over the administration of elections.

Trump’s executive order would require the compilation of lists of eligible voters and for the US Postal Service (USPS) to deliver ballots only to voters who are on the lists.

Officials from several states had warned that a lack of legal clarity around the plan was sowing chaos months before the November 3 vote.

Several states, including North Carolina, have already begun sending mail-in ballots to voters.

A USPS whistleblower had also warned that millions of Americans may not receive ballots because the systems being used by the postal service have been put together in a “sloppy and rushed manner.”

Trump has long been a critic of mail-in ballots but has frequently used them himself, including last month when he voted by mail in Florida’s Republican primary.

The president has for years claimed without evidence that mail-in voting is highly vulnerable to fraud, repeatedly linking it to his false assertion that the 2020 presidential election was stolen from him by Democrat Joe Biden.

Polls show that Trump’s Republican Party faces a serious threat of losing its narrow control of Congress in November, particularly the House of Representatives.

If Democrats win, they have signaled they would block Trump’s agenda and could even move to impeach him for the third time. — AFP

View the original on Malay Mail

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.