InquirerAMLC witness: Romualdez’s cash inflows not traced to DPWH, Zaldy CoThe Jerusalem PostRepublicans Vance, Rubio, Democrats Ossoff, Buttigieg favored for 2028 US elections - pollDaily MaverickTackling Western Cape municipal chaos takes serious people doing serious thingsZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioBillboardDeftones to Tour Again in Spring 2027: Here Are the North America DatesRolling StoneBeastie Boys’ Groundbreaking ‘Licensed to Ill’ to Get Lavishly Ill Vinyl ReissueБи-би-сиОдин человек погиб, четверо ранены в результате стрельбы в центре Вашингтона. Полиция ищет стрелкаStraits Times SportBeauden Barratt named All Blacks captain in much changed team for Wales testBBC BusinessAI's rock star boss - who is Jensen Huang ?20 MinutenIhr Freund isst alle ihre Snacks – nun hat Louise ein «Mausfach»VarietyIDFA Industry Head Says Docs Like ‘Musk’ and ‘NAZA’ Signal That Audiences Want ‘Timely’ Films: They Offer ‘Something They Feel They Have to Know’SudinfoTurquie-Belgique : les Diables rouges doivent s’imposer pour viser les quarts de finale (direct à 18h)
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Thursday, November 12, 2026

ICRC 'currently classifying the highest number of armed conflicts since the Second World War

Translate

François Picard is pleased to welcome the President of the International Committee of the Red Cross, Mirjana Spoljaric. “You may consider war a human condition,” argues Spoljaric. “But brutality, barbarity, is not a human condition.” Her warning recalls the fundamental premise of the 1949 Geneva Conventions: even in war, there can be no lawless space, and certain red lines must never be crossed.

War may be an enduring feature of human history, but its brutality is neither inevitable nor beyond restraint. That distinction lies at the heart of a stark warning from Spoljaric who argues that the international rules established to protect civilians are being progressively weakened amid proliferating armed conflicts, technological transformations and the retreat of diplomacy.

From Gaza and Ukraine to Sudan and Yemen, Spoljaric describes an increasingly permissive interpretation of international humanitarian law, in which civilian infrastructure is attacked, populations are displaced and human suffering becomes an instrument of military strategy. “So humans are instrumentalized in the pursuit of military objectives,” she says

The proliferation of drones and artificial intelligence adds another troubling dimension. Technologies once presented as instruments of greater military precision have not, she argues, delivered the promised protection for civilians. Instead, they risk further diminishing the possibility of escaping violence, while the prospect of autonomous weapons targeting human beings raises urgent legal and ethical questions.

But Spoljaric's deepest concern extends beyond the battlefield. As conflicts increasingly cross borders and humanitarian needs overwhelm available resources, diplomacy has taken a back seat to might makes right. Her message is also political: humanitarian assistance cannot substitute for the prevention of war, and the protection of civilians cannot depend on goodwill alone.

The responsibility, she insists, belongs to governments and citizens alike. “As a citizen, demand that your government prioritise the rules of war,” she urges, warning that “wars are coming to your doorstep nowadays much, much faster than in previous years.”

View the original on France 24 →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.