ESPN DeportesSantos remonta a Toluca y logra su segundo triunfo de visita en 41 partidosESPNCubs' Bregman hit in face by foul ball while on deck, sent to hospital for testsSözcü236 milyonluk para trafiğini açıklayamadıUOLDefesa Civil emite alerta para tempestade, granizo e fortes ventos no RSБи-би-си«Катастрофа». Партия Мерца не проходит в региональный парламент по итогам выборов в Мекленбурге-Передней ПомеранииLenta.ruВ США отреагировали на угрозы Зеленского закрыть небо над РоссиейNew Straits TimesPutin's party set to retain power after Russia vote hit by cyberattacks, drones中国新闻网长江生态环保集团有限公司副总经理袁建伟接受审查调查Daily MailHappy BEAR-thday! Giant pandas across the world celebrate milestonesEl TiempoGrave incendio en el cerro de San Marcos en Villa de Leyva: declaran calamidad pública y suspenden las clasesCNN BrasilInternacional anuncia demissão do técnico Paulo PezzolanoFrance 24US, China discuss AI safety ahead of Trump-Xi summit
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Monday, September 21, 2026

Converse pulls sneaker ad critics say includes racist imagery

Translate

The sneaker company Converse has removed a social media ad that sparked outrage among critics who viewed it as evoking the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) and lynching.

The Instagram ad photo showed K-pop singer Karina wearing a skirt and holding a pair of Chuck 70 X sneakers.

The lower half of a woman in a white skirt holds a pair of black Converse high top shoes.

The ad has since been removed by Converse. (Supplied: Converse)

Critics lashed out online, saying a white triangular image created by lighting on the skirt resembled a KKK hood and the way she held the sneakers made them look like the dangling feet of a lynching victim.

Converse, owned by Nike, issued a statement apologising and said it had removed the ad.

"We're sorry," the statement said.

"We understand why this image is deeply upsetting and recognise that we got this wrong. We removed it from our channels and are working to remove it everywhere it appeared. 

"This should not have happened and we will do better."

Converse, based in Boston in the United States, declined to answer questions seeking additional information, including how the company screened ads before they were posted and how the ad was approved.

Karina and her management company, SM Entertainment Group, did not immediately respond to messages through their Instagram accounts.

Corporations 'failing the same test'

Retailers and top fashion brands have issued a string of apologies over the years for products and advertising criticised for being racially insensitive.

Last month, US retailer Target Corporation pulled a children's Halloween costume from its shelves after widespread social media backlash, apologising for selling a garment that critics said evoked racist minstrel caricatures.

The Converse photo sparked swift criticism, including calls for staff involved in the ad to be fired and for a boycott of the company.

In a slew of comments on social media, posters questioned how the ad could have cleared the company's advertising vetting process.

Other commenters defended Converse, saying they did not believe it was intentional.

The Converse logo is displayed on the roof of a building in Boston

Converse issued a statement saying the company understood why the image was "deeply upsetting". (AP Photo: Charles Krupa, file)

Civil rights attorney Lee Merritt, who is based in Texas, posted on Instagram that Converse's apology "doesn't undo what got past legal, marketing and leadership at every step".

"We keep having this conversation because corporations keep failing the same test," he wrote. 

"Do better means catching this before it airs — not after we're offended."

Converse, founded in Malden, Massachusetts, in 1908, makes the iconic Chuck Taylor All Star sneaker. 

It was first released in 1917 as a non-skid basketball shoe, adding the signature of Taylor, a basketball player who promoted the sneaker, in 1934, according to the company's website.

View the original on ABC News (Australia)

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.