Inquirer15-year-old charged with parricide over mother’s killing in BoholThe Jerusalem PostLiberman willing to compromise on haredi IDF draft law, UTJ chairman welcomes 'flexibility'PunchTelcos sue Reps over poor network service probeDaily MaverickMacau ex-lawmaker sentenced to 12.5 years in prison in city’s first national security trialInquirer EntertainmentStar Magic calls out bullying vs Cianne Dominguez, other ‘PBB’ housematesScreen RantThe Witcher Officially Switches Genres In No Man's LandSouth China Morning PostViral Chinese app lets strangers vote on purchases to stop impulse buyingComplete SportsEuromatch NPFL: Ranchers Bees To Host Enyimba In MinnaGIGAZINEなぜかWindowsの「ペイント」にリモートコード実行の脆弱性VarietyTorino Chief on His Stellar Lineup With John Travolta, Pamela Anderson and Isabelle Huppert, and Why a ‘Festival Is Like an Art Gallery’ZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioOnetNajlepszy europejski pocisk dla Ukrainy? "To wrażliwa kwestia"
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Friday, November 6, 2026

'It was an imposter': X tells HC takedown notices for IFF, SFLC not sent by Delhi Police

Translate

'It was an imposter': X tells HC takedown notices for IFF, SFLC not sent by Delhi Police

‘Imposter’ posed as Delhi police to seek blocking of IFF, SFLC accounts, X tells HC

Social media platform X told the Delhi high court on Friday that notices directing it to block the accounts of the Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) and the Software Freedom Law Centre (SFLC) had been sent by an imposter and not the Delhi Police.The submission was made before Justice Amit Mahajan, who was hearing petitions filed by IFF and SFLC challenging the notices purportedly issued by the Delhi Police to block their social media handles.X's counsel told the court that the platform had conducted an internal investigation and found that the notices were sent by an imposter. The counsel also informed the court that X had filed a complaint with the Delhi Police against the person responsible and that the accounts of IFF and SFLC would not be taken down.

"It was an imposter. We have done an internal investigation and it turn out this was an imposter. We have filed a complaint with Delhi Police," the counsel stated.The court disposed of the petitions after taking note of X's submission.The matter raised concerns over the alleged misuse of mechanisms for submitting legal and content takedown requests to social media platforms. X has filed a police complaint, seeking an investigation into the identity of the person who sent the purported notices.

View the original on Times of India →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.