Bollywood HungamaRamayana producer Namit Malhotra calls Los Angeles premiere his “Oscar moment” ahead of November 5 releaseEl ComercioLa hoja de ruta de Estados Unidos para Venezuela: reformas, vacancia de Delcy Rodríguez y eleccionesPunchBREAKING: NELFUND introduces token system to stop double payment of school feesThe Jerusalem PostQatari mediators present peace deal to Iran in mediation effort, official saysInquirer EntertainmentDonny Pangilinan felt ‘awkward’ over Showtime Baby Doll Juby’s dream about himDaily MaverickWildlife is not livestock — Aucamp’s dangerous plan to turn conservation into agricultureInquirerMimaropa drug bust in Palawan yields ₱51,884 worth of ‘shabu’ZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioSky TG24Meteo, freddo e maltempo in Italia nel weekend di Halloween e Ognissanti. Le previsioniVariety‘One Cut of the Dead’ Director Ueda Shinichiro on Turning a Microdrama Into Tokyo Feature ‘Earthlings in Love’NumeramaÀ mi chemin entre le VTC et le longtail, le vélo électrique Nakamura Crosscity+ perd 500 €DeadlineRussell Brand Forcefully Denies Charges As He Gives Evidence During Rape Trial
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, October 28, 2026

Ridon wants libel laws reviewed after Lustre’s sudden arrest

Translate
Veteran journo held for libel, ‘unaware’ of case in Davao
IN THE DARK Veteran journalist Philip Lustre Jr., escorted by police officers, leaves the Quezon City police station in Kamuning on Saturday to undergo a mandatory medical examination following his arrest for cyberlibel. (Photo from GRIG C. MONTEGRANDE / INQUIRER.net)

MANILA, Philippines — Congress must review the country’s laws on libel after the sudden arrest of veteran journalist Philip Lustre Jr. so that there will be a balance between protecting reputations and press freedom.

This view came from Bicol Saro party-list Rep. Terry Ridon on Wednesday.

Ridon said that while he agrees with the need to protect people’s reputations, it should not come at the expense of press freedom.

Article continues after this advertisement

He noted that journalists should not be barred from asking tough questions.

FEATURED STORIES

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

Lustre was nabbed on Saturday morning over a cyberlibel case against him before a Davao City court.

He was eventually released on Saturday night after posting bail of P48,000, after his friends in the media pooled funds for his release.

“Protect reputations, yes. Silence the press, no,” Ridon said. “Journalists should not be afraid to ask tough questions.”

“People have the right to seek justice. But the public also has the right to know,” he noted.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Veteran journalist Lustre arrested in QC for cyber libel 

Ridon’s call for a review of libel laws came after human rights lawyer Dino de Leon – also Luster’s counsel – reiterated the need to decriminalize libel and cyberlibel.

Article continues after this advertisement

De Leon, in a press briefing earlier, said that the arrest order was issued even if Lustre had not received the complaint or a subpoena.

Any of these documents would give him a chance to answer the allegations before the case reached court.

The lawyer urged the Department of Justice (DOJ) to investigate how the complaint was handled and determine whether it followed proper procedures.

READ: Philip Lustre feels unsafe in Davao; seeks transfer of cyberlibel case

Lustre, a vocal critic of the Duterte family, was apprehended based on a cyberlibel complaint from Vice President Sara Duterte’s husband, lawyer Manases Carpio.

The case stemmed from a Facebook post published on March 6, 2026, through an account named “Philip Jr Lustre,” according to a court document provided by lawyer Dino De Leon.

READ: Sara Duterte’s husband Mans Carpio behind cyberlibel case vs Lustre 

But Lustre’s lawyers questioned the impartiality of the prosecution office handling the case.

They said that he got information that Davao City Prosecutor Jhopee Salvador Avanceña is the first cousin of Honeylet Avanceña.

Avanceña is the longtime partner of Duterte’s father, former President Rodrigo Duterte. 

Such concerns, Ridon said, only strengthen the need to examine libel and cyber libel laws in the country.

The lawmaker wants to avoid a chilling effect where journalists will self-censor themselves if they report on controversial issues.

He, however, clarified that reviewing libel laws does not mean giving journalists a free pass to publish false or damaging claims.

Rather, it is only meant to ensure that legitimate reporting is protected, Ridon stressed.

“False statements must be dealt with. But asking legitimate questions should not be a crime,” he said. 

“That burden can scare people into silence,” Ridon lamented. “Congress should take that seriously.”

Last Monday, he called out the members of the Duterte family for the cyberlibel cases against members of the media, saying that current lawmakers will not allow it to happen again.

READ: Dutertes harassed media before, we won’t allow it this time – Ridon

The lawmaker was referring to the case against Lustre and broadcast network GMA-7.

GMA-7 was sued by Vice President Duterte’s brother, Davao City Rep. Paolo “Pulong” Duterte over allegations of bribery that he said were “untrue” and meant to destroy his reputation.

Aside from GMA-7 officials, Duterte filed complaints against National Bureau of Investigation Director Melvin Matibag and dismissed police officer Rodulfo Gracioso Jr.

Duterte personally appeared at the Davao City Prosecutor’s Office.

Named as respondents from GMA-7 were executives Felipe Gozon and Gilberto Duavit Jr., television personalities Mel Tiangco and Vicky Morales.

Also included were Emil Sumangil, Darlene Cay, Marvin Parado and Joel San Luis, as well as John and Jane Does.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.

Your subscription has been successful.

Ridon said there is a precedent for how the Dutertes treat the media: Broadcast giant ABS-CBN was shut down, and Rappler reporters were harassed during the former president’s term. /apl

View the original on Inquirer →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.