PunchPHOTOS: Olu Jacobs’ funeral mass underway, Hamzat, Amosun, others attendDaily MaverickHas the City of Cape Town stopped listening to residents who oppose development?InquirerPalawan confirms ASF case, strengthens containment measuresХабрFAIRouter. Мы научили ИИ выбирать лучшую LLM модель для каждой задачиZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioSRF NewsWahlen Kanton Freiburg – Die Freiburger Kantonsregierung steht vor einem Umbruch7sur7Lula, l’ultime course d’un géant de la gauche brésilienneSportstarIndia vs China LIVE score, Asian Games 2026 women's hockey final: Match delayed; Gold-medal match from 4:30pm IST onwardsNHK 社会【動画】Pickup NEWS(10月2日)Il Fatto QuotidianoX Factor 2026, Giorgia si commuove dietro le quinte: il 18enne che ha cantato Alex Baroni la lascia senza parole. Poi i quattro giudici bocciano la performanceCollider10 Must-Watch Shows for Fans of HBO's 'Lanterns'BBC NewsNo more cereal at the end of the aisle? New rules in Scotland's supermarkets
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Friday, October 2, 2026

OpenAI fires workers for mishandling ‘sensitive information’

Translate

OpenAI has fired three researchers for allegedly mishandling information, including work that involved an external organisation that analyses artificial intelligence (AI) models.

"Our investigation confirmed that these individuals mishandled sensitive information outside established company procedures, violating our policies and breaking the trust essential to our work," a spokesperson told the BBC.

The maker of ChatGPT did not name the sacked workers, but at least two of them were involved in safety research at the firm.

The firings come as the debate over AI safety and the risks the technology may pose to humanity has intensified in recent weeks.

"We have parted ways with three individuals for violating our policies on accessing and handling sensitive company information," OpenAI's spokesperson said.

The BBC understands the former employees were not let go for raising safety concerns but for allegedly mishandling sensitive information.

Concerns over AI safety have made headlines after some researchers and industry executives called for more guardrails around the technology.

OpenAI has come under intense scrutiny after its models went rogue and hacked several platforms, including Australian government websites.

In an earlier incident, an OpenAI system accessed the internet and breached the open-source developer platform Hugging Face.

That incident led OpenAI to conduct a broad review of the activities of its AI models - called agents, which are designed to execute tasks autonomously based on simple instructions.

The AI lab said this week that it has notified more than 100 organisations about incidents involving unauthoritised activity linked to its AI systems.

Being notified "does not mean that any private information was accessed" or that a system was compromised, OpenAI said.

In September, researcher Jacob Coxon, who left Anthropic, called for AI development to slow down so its potential risks could be properly assessed.

Anthropic boss Dario Amodei and OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman have also called for measures to address concerns over AI.

On Tuesday, US President Donald Trump hosted a meeting of top technology bosses - including leaders from OpenAI, Anthropic, Nvidia, SpaceX, Meta and Google - to discuss AI.

After the gathering at the White House, Trump posted a document that he called a "morally binding" agreement that would serve as a "form of protection" from AI's potential risks.

Some technology experts criticised the pact, pointing out that it allowed AI companies to regulate themselves.

Trump has repeatedly downplayed concerns about AI's risks in response to calls from some industry figures for tighter oversight of the technology.

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.

Tags:  

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.

View the original on MyJoyOnline →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.