ESPN DeportesCristiano Ronaldo abandonó la concentración de Portugal: ¿qué dijo al respecto?RTP DesportoO que esperar da seleção portuguesa frente à Dinamarca?Daily MaverickFalse white genocide claims divide us and obscure the wider crime crisisESPNRavens' Henry: 'Always love' for Titans, but not much for Sunday's reunionThe Jerusalem PostTrump senior adviser tells 'Post' that 'Iran will be resolved imminently' - interviewVarietyAlec Baldwin’s Claims Against ‘Rust’ Prosecutor Dismissed on Immunity GroundsBBC عربيركاب رحلة "فلاي دبي" يصلون تل أبيب ونتنياهو يلتقيهم في المطار، وإسرائيل تعتزم تشديد فحص الطيارين الدوليين3DNewsMicrosoft разрешила оцифровывать игры с дисков всем пользователям Xbox Series X и Xbox OneBillboardMacklemore Says His Free Palestine Tour ‘Sold Out Immediately,’ Teases ‘Lineups Coming Soon’NOS SportRonaldo vertrekt boos bij Portugese ploeg, dag voor duel met DenemarkenMeduzaПравительство внесло в Госдуму проект бюджета на три ближайших года. Его общий дефицит — почти 16 триллионов рублейRFI 中文一架从迪拜飞往以色列航班流血惊魂一幕 多亏乘客机智英勇
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, September 30, 2026

Unfair method of splitting pensions can add to the pain of divorce | Letters

Translate

Your article on the impact of the escalating cost of living on divorce settlements (Unhappy couples staying put due to cost of living crisis, say divorce lawyers, 23 September) provides a timely reminder of the financial inequities facing many separating couples.

As a pensions expert, I have regularly encountered a particular imbalance in the splitting of pension assets on divorce. Although the last Labour government enabled pension savings to be taken into account in divorce settlements, there remains, 25 years on, an inherent unfairness in the way many such arrangements are implemented.

Where one partner (usually the husband) has built up valuable pension entitlements through a defined benefit pension, the allocation of those assets on divorce is often based on an equivalent cash value at the point of divorce, known as “external sharing”.

In thousands of such cases, especially those involving private sector pensions, this leads to the undervaluing of pension assets transferred – usually to the wife and, in some cases, by many thousands of pounds.

Divorce is a traumatic enough experience. This fundamental flaw in the legal process compounds unfairness and is both unnecessary and easily rectified. The government should address this urgently to avoid sleepwalking into another pensions scandal.
Richard Nobbs
Excalibur Actuaries

View the original on The Guardian →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.