Crisis reveals the quality of your preparation

A crisis does not create an organisation’s character. It reveals it.

In tranquil times, almost any institution can appear competently governed. Meetings are convened, policies approved, reports circulated, and targets reviewed. Order becomes easy to mistake for resilience. Then a cyberattack cripples operations, a regulator intervenes, a supplier collapses, an industrial accident occurs, or public confidence suddenly disappears. The reassuring architecture of routine gives way to more elemental questions: Who is in charge? Which information can be trusted? Who has authority to act? What must be protected first? What should employees, customers, investors and regulators be told?

The quality of the answers is rarely determined at the height of the emergency. It was shaped long before the first alarm sounded.

Most organisations do not enter crises without warning. Signals usually appear, but leaders misread them, underestimate them or suppress them. Uncomfortable information is softened as it moves upward. Dissenting voices are excluded. Familiar assumptions become articles of faith. By the time the threat can no longer be ignored, the organisation is responding not merely to the crisis but also to the accumulated cost of its earlier complacency.

That danger has intensified. Leaders must pursue growth while navigating geopolitical instability, cyber threats, regulatory change, fragile supply chains, social-media scrutiny, disruptive technologies and the uncertain consequences of artificial intelligence. Decisions once deferred until the next board meeting may now be required within minutes.

No chief executive or director can master every technical field. But leaders must know enough to ask penetrating questions, detect evasive answers and recognise when specialist expertise is needed. Leadership is not omniscience. It is disciplined curiosity, sound judgement and the ability to connect scattered signals before they become a destructive pattern.

Preparedness is often confused with possessing a contingency plan. Yet a plan that has never been tested is not a capability; it is an assumption.

True readiness combines rehearsed procedures, trained people, reliable information, delegated authority, financial resilience and communication systems that remain functional under pressure. A prepared organisation examines uncomfortable possibilities. What happens if the chief executive is unreachable? Can critical technology be restored quickly? What if a major supplier fails? Who speaks when public confidence collapses overnight?

Cybersecurity demonstrates why such questions matter. The issue is no longer whether an organisation will face an attempted intrusion, but whether it has reduced avoidable exposure and can respond intelligently. A technology crisis may begin not with a spectacular ransom demand but with an untested software update, a vulnerable contractor or an employee retaining inappropriate access. Controls that appear burdensome in peaceful times become indispensable under attack.

• Tackling the renewed inflation
• Banks shut 476 branches in three years – CBN
• 25 years after 9/11 attack, US panel demands fresh security reforms

Preparedness also demands the courage to question success. Kodak had access to digital-camera technology but remained committed to the economics of film. Its downfall was not simply a failure of technological awareness. It was a failure of strategic courage. Organisations are often defeated not by what they do not know, but by what they know and choose not to confront.

When crisis arrives, leadership’s first duty is sensemaking: determining what has happened, what it means, what remains uncertain and what must happen next. Early information will be incomplete, contradictory and emotionally charged. Leaders who panic, deny reality or search only for facts that confirm their assumptions can turn a containable incident into an institutional disaster.

Culture then becomes decisive. An organisation that punishes bad news guarantees that bad news will arrive late. Effective leaders listen beyond rank—to technical experts, frontline employees, lawyers, operations teams and communication professionals. The person closest to the problem may be the least senior person in the room. Inviting dissent does not weaken decisiveness; it improves the decision.

Trust is equally essential, and you cannot improvise it. It is accumulated through competence, fairness, integrity and transparency. Where trust exists, employees cooperate, customers show patience and investors tolerate uncertainty. Where it is absent, even truthful statements may sound evasive. That is why communication is not merely a public-relations function. Leaders must communicate early, honestly and repeatedly—without speculation, denial or disappearance. Silence creates a vacuum that rumour will eagerly occupy.

Nigeria’s financial sector offers a sobering lesson. On January 10, 2024, the Central Bank of Nigeria dissolved the boards and management of Union Bank, Keystone Bank and Polaris Bank, citing regulatory non-compliance and corporate-governance failures. Whatever the debates surrounding those interventions, the wider lesson is unmistakable: compliance cannot be outsourced to a department. It is a board-level responsibility. The second lesson is that crises almost always send signals which are ignored. Few crises erupt without warning.

No organisation can foresee or prevent every crisis. Technology will fail, markets will shift, suppliers will disappoint, and regulators will intervene. But leaders can decide whether authority is clear, information is accessible, systems are tested, and stakeholders trust the institution.

Preparedness is not an administrative ritual. It is governance translated into readiness. A crisis may arrive without warning, but whether an organisation meets it with confusion or competence is largely determined beforehand. The real question is not what leaders will do when a crisis comes. It is what they are doing now to deserve confidence when it does.

Peterside is a leadership architect and management turnaround expert and the author of Leading in a Storm.