ESPNNFL tight ends show out on National Tight Ends DayThe Jerusalem PostPutin to meet Iran's Pezeshkian, Emir of Qatar on Tuesday in Moscow, Kremlin saysESPN Deportes¿A qué tenemos que prestar atención para el Juego 3?Daily MaverickEl Niño threatens to deepen southern Africa’s poverty crisisInquirer EntertainmentLove Knots, October 27, 2026ZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioNMEPatti Smith tells Dua Lipa bout her “book of gratitude” ‘Bread Of Angels’ at emotional London Literature Festival appearance: “I swore I’d never write another memoir”Numerama« Si une bande de gamins peut faire ça, les Chinois ne sont peut-être pas loin derrière » : un incident chez Anthropic inquiète Washington20 Minuten«Er fiel 1500 Meter»: Sturz von Wolfgang W. gibt Rätsel aufSRF NewsAuslosung Viertelfinals – GC – YB und Servette – Basel als Schlagerpartien im Frauen-CupWirtualna PolskaSerbia skręciła na Zachód. Ekspertka: W Belgradzie są cały czas media spod znaku PutinaScreen RantAlexander Skarsgård's New Fantasy Movie Wicker Makes Back Half Its Budget In One Weekend
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Monday, October 26, 2026

Elvis Presley’s Music Owners Sue Anthropic for Copyright Infringement, Demand Nearly $50 Million in Damages

Translate

A collection of stakeholders and music companies that control the rights to Elvis Presley’s music sued Anthropic for copyright infringement, telling a federal court the AI company prioritized a potential multitrillion-dollar stock opening over respecting the copyright of the King of Rock ‘n’ Roll.

In a 28-page lawsuit filed Friday in the Northern District of California, the plaintiffs — including Authentic Brands Group, Raleigh Music Publishing and others — claimed the company’s AI model Claude was improperly trained on 274 of Presley’s songs, including iconic tracks such as “Can’t Help Falling in Love with You,” “Run On” and “Farther Along.” The group is demanding a total of $48.6 million in damages for the use of the songs and for Anthropic to cease infringing the rights holders’ copyright.

The plaintiffs’ lead attorney, Richard Busch, repeatedly takes aim at Anthropic’s public representation as a company eager to better humanity through AI by highlighting the other copyright infringement cases it was fighting.

“While in other cases for copyright infringement, Defendant has waxed poetic about the necessity of progress and AI’s value to society, there is simply no reason—other than rote expediency—to have that progress come at the cost of copyright holders,” Busch writes

Busch also claimed Anthropic’s virutistic posture contradicted its pursuit of a potentially $2 trillion initial public offering, tying its use of Presley’s catalog as a means of boosting its valuation. “The Works were created over periods of dozens of years, and Anthropic, by its infringing conduct, is destroying the value of these Works in a matter of a few years with only profit as its motive,” he wrote.

Busch and Anthropic did not respond to immediate requests for comment. Busch, a renowed music rights lawyer, previously sued Anthropic on behalf of Round Hill Music, an independent publisher, for $1 billion in August for allegedly illegally scraping hundreds of songs without permission.

Anthropic has faced several copyright infringement lawsuits from artists and writers over how it has trained its AI models, settling a lawsuit with a group of authors last year for $1.5 billion after they accused the company of misusing their books for such training. The Presley lawsuits as AI companies have gotten increasingly entangled in litigation over their models, following lawsuits against companies including Suno, Udio and others.

View the original on Variety →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.