The Jerusalem PostWho is behind Europe’s wave of bomb threats, cyberattacks?Daily MaverickCAPE RESIDENCY: Durban’s sustainability hero comes to the Cape for a summer seasonInquirerSupreme Court looking into killing of Basilan RTC judgeInquirer EntertainmentFyang Smith humbled by ‘horror princess’ tag: ‘Malaking responsibility’ZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioABC NewsAt least 8 dead, multiple injured after building collapses in BrooklynNOS SportAmerikaanse voetballers om veiligheidsredenen niet naar WK onder 17 in QatarBBC NewsTwo men found guilty of spying for Iran over plan to target UK-based journalistsSRF NewsMidterms 2026 – Demokrat Scott Colom gewinnt Senatssitz in MississippiTagesschauWarum Filme aus Südkorea in Europa und den USA so gut ankommenThe IndependentUK economy grows by 0.7% – fastest pace in two yearsRapplerPadilla to prosecution: ‘Bakit issue ‘yung pagpunta sa China?’
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Thursday, November 12, 2026

UK fines Meta US$597,000 over repeated inaccuracies in WhatsApp data

Translate

Britain’s ⁠media regulator Ofcom ⁠said on Thursday ⁠it had fined Meta £450,000 (US$597,000) for providing inaccurate information about its WhatsApp Business service in response to requests it made as part of its ‌telecoms market review.

Ofcom reviewed the market for business bulk SMS text messages in 2025 to better understand the services available to businesses.

Ofcom sought information in 2025 about WhatsApp for Business, including messaging ⁠volumes and revenues.

The regulator said Meta had provided ‌inaccurate information multiple times, with some inaccuracies remaining unresolved for up to 11 months before corrected ‌data was submitted.

In ‌a separate case, ‌Meta lost a legal challenge against Ofcom in October over information requests. Photo: Reuters

In ‌a separate case, ‌Meta lost a legal challenge against Ofcom in October over information requests. Photo: Reuters

Ofcom launched an investigation into ⁠Meta in ⁠January in relation to the inaccuracies.

Ofcom concluded Meta contravened five ‌separate information requirements under Britain’s communications act across two requests by failing to provide ‌complete ‌and accurate information.

The initial £600,000 penalty was reduced ‌by 25 per cent because Meta accepted liability and agreed to ⁠settle and did not benefit from providing inaccurate information.

Meta ⁠said in a statement that it took its regulatory obligations “seriously” and had “cooperated fully” with Ofcom’s investigation.

In ‌a separate case, ‌Meta along with TikTok and X lost a legal challenge against Ofcom in October over information requests made under Britain’s online safety regime.

View the original on South China Morning Post →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.