Why are we still buying shoes designed for someone else’s feet?

Malaysian women are hardly strangers to the idea that products developed elsewhere may not always suit them perfectly. Bra sizing, foundation shades and skincare have all undergone some degree of regional rethinking as brands recognised differences in body shape, skin tone and climate.

Yet when it comes to footwear, the conversation around “Asian fit” has remained surprisingly limited.

This is especially curious given that shoes are one of the products in which poor fit is immediately physical. A pair may look perfectly fine in the mirror yet pinch across the forefoot, rub at the heel, or place pressure on the toes after only a few hours.

For decades, uncomfortable shoes have often been treated as something the wearer simply has to endure until they are “broken in”. But that assumes the foot should accommodate the shoe, rather than asking whether the shoe was properly shaped for the foot in the first place.

“A lot of discomfort gets blamed on the customer,” said Cherriann Wong, founder of Singapore-born footwear label Sunday Staples. “It’s rarely that the size is wrong – it’s that the shoe was never shaped for this foot to begin with.

“Once you start designing around that, from the width of the last to how a strap sits, comfort stops being something you have to compromise for.”

Shoe sizing tends to focus heavily on length – but that tells only part of the story. A 2018 analysis of more than one million 3D foot scans from North America, Europe, Asia and Australia found that, on average, Asian participants had shorter feet than those in the other regions, while their feet were proportionally wider relative to length.

The pattern was observed in both men and women. That matters because shoes are constructed around a “last” – the three-dimensional form that determines their underlying shape, including width, toe room and heel contour.

If a last is relatively narrow through the forefoot, someone may technically be wearing the correct size while still experiencing pressure across the widest part of the foot.

The mismatch is especially noticeable in styles with little room for adjustment, such as ballet flats, pointed shoes or strappy sandals. Toes may feel compressed, straps begin to rub and a shoe that seemed comfortable in the shop becomes considerably less agreeable several hours later.

None of this necessarily means there is anything unusual about the wearer’s foot. It may simply reflect a mismatch between foot proportions and the shape on which the shoe was constructed.

Fit is only one part of the equation. Footwear also has to survive the conditions in which people actually wear it.

Malaysians routinely move between heat, humidity, sudden rain and aggressively air-conditioned interiors, often in the course of a single day. A work shoe may have to cope with a commute, long periods of standing, several meetings and an evening appointment before it finally comes off.

Materials that feel acceptable in a cooler climate may behave differently here. Heat and moisture can make feet swell slightly, while stiff straps or poorly ventilated materials can become increasingly uncomfortable as the day wears on.

This is why some Southeast Asian footwear designers have begun paying closer attention not only to width and shape, but also to softer straps, heel cushioning and materials that cope better with humidity and rain.

Wong said more pliable construction, additional heel padding and quicker-drying fabrics can make a significant difference when shoes are intended for long hours of everyday wear.

Footwear has also long been sold around a familiar trade-off: stylish shoes are expected to hurt, while comfortable ones are assumed to be less flattering.

Yet better fit does not necessarily require chunkier silhouettes or dramatically different designs. Small changes in forefoot width, strap placement, heel stability or flexibility can alter how a shoe feels without substantially changing how it looks.

That matters as consumers grow less willing to tolerate clothing and accessories that work against their bodies.

Not one-size-fits-all

The wider fashion and beauty industries have already moved towards recognising that one shape, shade or formula will not suit everyone. Footwear may simply be arriving later to the same conclusion.

And “Asian fit”, useful though the phrase may be, should not suggest that every Asian foot is built the same way. There is enormous variation within any population, while factors such as age, body weight, pregnancy and medical conditions can also change foot shape over time.

What the term can usefully highlight, however, is that proportions differ across populations and that shoe design should take those differences seriously.

Ultimately, the question is not whether consumers need a special category of footwear simply because they live in Asia. It is whether shoes can be designed with a better understanding of the people, climate and everyday conditions they are intended for.

If that happens, “breaking in” a new pair may eventually become less of an accepted ritual – and more of a sign that the shoe was never quite right to begin with.

Subscribe to our newsletter and get news delivered to your mailbox.