ESPN2027 recruiting class rankings: Duke enters top 45 in latest updateThe Jerusalem PostFlights must be open to all or to no one, Iranian adviser says following Iraqi airport suspensionDaily MaverickFreedom from the ANC could be our real emancipationPunchLady apologises for AI-generated Itel power tank explosion imageUN NewsThe Takeaway: UN General Assembly debate Day 3RTP DesportoGP de Portugal antecipado para outubro em 2027, Argentina regressa e Hungria saiInquirerMarcos signs BSKE postponement into lawBollywood HungamaA true MASTERSTROKE: Avengers Endgame: Encore has MORE surprises beyond the leaked scenes; Marvel saves its BIGGEST twist for theatres (SPOILERS ahead)SCMP ChinaXi Jinping marks second Mid-Autumn Festival in US during state visitRadio Times10 Questions with Amol Rajan and Hannah FryBillboardMusic Venue Trust Teams Up With Drowned In Sound to Launch Live Music TitleSouth China Morning PostItaly to ban burkas in schools, with 30% cap on pupils with poor Italian
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Friday, September 25, 2026

OVP: ‘No funds lost’ as COA flags recording defects in P168M relief ops

Translate
Better for Sara Duterte to appear personally at impeachment trial
Vice President Sara Duterte leads a relief goods distribution drive in Cotabato City. (Photo posted on her Facebook account on July 3, 2026.)

MANILA, Philippines — After the Commission on Audit (COA) flagged documentary deficiencies in its relief operations worth almost P168 million, the office of Vice President Sara Duterte on Friday said no funds were lost in these transactions.

The Office of the Vice President (PVP) reported that all funds are now accounted for.

The relief operations of this office were flagged in a 273-page COA report on the 2025 Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (DRRM) Fund.

Article continues after this advertisement

The report was submitted on August 28 to Defense Secretary Gilberto Teodoro, the concurrent chairman of the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council.

FEATURED STORIES

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

The OVP clarified that the matter cited in the DRRM Funds Audit Report “pertains to deficiencies in certain pre-operation documentary requirements set by the OVP itself.”

It further noted that these requirerments are “part of its internal procedures, and not requirements imposed by COA or other laws.”

“No funds were lost, and all funds are accounted for,” the OVP said in a statement.

“The relief operations were actually carried out, and the beneficiaries were recorded and validated, based on the available supporting documents and field records submitted to the COA Audit Team,” it added.

Article continues after this advertisement

According to the audit report, inconsistencies were observed between situational reports (sitreps) from the agencies or local government units concerned and OVP’s own sitreps amounting to ₱19.67 million. 

COA had noted deviations from the approved mission orders during actual operations worth ₱39 million, as well as the issuance of “open-ended” mission orders amounting to ₱84.1 million.

Article continues after this advertisement

Furthermore, the state auditors’ submission also cited deficiencies in beneficiary documentation and distribution records.

They also observed incomplete, missing or non-submission of required documents, in the amount of ₱25.2 million.

To address this, the COA made several recommendations to the OVP.

The commission told the vice president’s office that it should strengthen the review procedures on relief operations to ensure completeness, consistency and accuracy of the OVP’s documents.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.

Your subscription has been successful.

For its part, the OVP said it “continues to strengthen its processes for documentation, validation and monitoring to ensure that the records of every operation are complete and in order, especially during emergency responses and calamities.” /apl

View the original on Inquirer →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.