InquirerBARMM Grand Coalition: No alliance with any party yetESPN DeportesStroud, Texans a ley de su primera victoria de la temporadaESPNIs this finally Milwaukee's year? Examining why Brewers' way will (or won't) workThe Jerusalem Post‘There was nobody in the cockpit’: Israeli passenger reconstructs flydubai attackDaily MaverickLOCAL ELECTIONS 2026: Moneybags Malema promises NMB free water and electricity, and bigger RDP houses한겨레“한국, 동맹 의존·몰입 벗어나 자강 중심 국제연대 고민해야”ZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFRTP DesportoAusência de Cristiano Ronaldo divide opiniões junto ao Estádio do DragãoSouth China Morning PostNetanyahu orders security review of international flights to Israel after Flydubai attackTechCrunchCan ‘super intelligence’ and a non-binding safety pact solve AI’s image problem?n-tv"Tatort: Explosive Mischung": Sieben kurze Geschichten der ZeitRMF24Gigantyczny pożar hali magazynowej w Słubicach. Strażacy walczą z żywiołem
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Sunday, October 4, 2026

Federal appeals court pauses Minnesota's AI nudification ban

Translate

Minnesota's law banning AI "nudification" images has been put on hold after a federal appeals court sided with Elon Musk's artificial intelligence company.

The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday granted an injunction sought by xAI, pausing enforcement of the law while the company's appeal moves forward. The court issued a brief, one-sentence order and did not explain its reasoning.

In early September, a lower court ruled the law could continue to be enforced while a lawsuit played out, but the appeals court overturned that decision. 

The first-of-its-kind law bans the process of taking someone's real picture and using AI to turn it into a pornographic or sexual image. 

The bill passed unanimously in the state Senate earlier this year and was supported by all but one lawmaker in the House. Gov. Tim Walz signed it into law in May.

Under the law, companies that create nonconsensual sexualized images and videos of people using artificial intelligence could face a civil penalty of up to $500,000, and the people who have been victimized can seek damages.

Musk's company, xAI, filed the lawsuit three days before the law was set to go into effect on Aug. 1, claiming it violates the First Amendment. It said the statute "imposes an overbroad, content-based ban on free speech and the tools of visual expression." xAI asked for a preliminary injunction to block the law from going into effect for the duration of the lawsuit.

After the September ruling, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison said he was "extremely proud to be defending this law."

WCCO has reached out to the attorney general's office for comment. 

View the original on CBS News →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.