Daily MaverickAFTER THE BELL: The fall of Numsa’s Irvin Jim — when institutions outgrow their eternal leadersESPNPower Rankings: How did an action-packed Week 8 change the top 25?The Jerusalem PostLikud files police complaint against Eisenkot campaign manager over Polymarket postESPN DeportesA qué hora es la entrega del Balón de Oro 2026The Hollywood ReporterAMC Global Media Chief Communications Officer Georgia Juvelis Exiting Later This Year3DNewsДыры в PHP начали использоваться в реальных атаках — подтверждены успешные взломыDeadlineGeorgia Juvelis Leaving As Chief Communications Officer Of AMC Global Media After 19 Years With CompanyZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFEuronewsAnthropic's IPO filing shows off soaring revenues as the company warns of AI's 'risks to humanity'Wirtualna PolskaZarzuty dla Brauna, Polska komentuje doniesienia ws. Orbana [SKRÓT DNIA]BillboardBeyoncé Explains Why Even People Who ‘Can’t Stand’ Her Music Like Her Hair-Care Productsn-tvRichter entscheidet gegen Trump: Entlassung von Epstein- und "Diddy"-Ermittlerin war unzulässig
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Monday, October 26, 2026

Ombudsman to monitor budget, review SC ruling

Translate

MANILA, Philippines — The Office of the Ombudsman plans to form a group that will review the Supreme Court ruling that struck down the national budgets in 2024 and 2025 along with portions of the 2026 outlay as unconstitutional.

The ombudsman also vowed to look at alleged anomalies in the budget proposals. 

Ombudsman Jesus Crispin Remulla said his agency “always (evaluates) decisions of the (SC) when they pinpoint culpability.”

Remulla made the remark after journalists asked if the ombudsman would study the SC ruling that invalidated the 2024 and 2025 national budgets, as well as specific provisions in this year’s national budget, primarily due to unlawful increases in unprogrammed appropriations (UA). 

“We have to act so we will study all of that and look at where the fault was, and how to make people explain their side or at least be made responsible for what they did,” he said at the SC yesterday.

The former congressman said after President Marcos finishes the proposed budget for the year, “the action goes on inside Congress, and it’s very hard to follow the action, especially for those who were scheming to add things and subtract things.”

One aspect of the budget that the ombudsman might look into is the “parked” allocations which, according to Remulla, was a “sign of bad faith, of playing with people’s money.” 

Remulla attended the signing of the memorandum of understanding between the Justice Sector Coordinating Council and the ombudsman yesterday. 

The ombudsman, outgoing Chief Justice Alexander Gesmundo and representatives from the Department of Justice and the Department of the Interior and Local Government signed the agreement.

Meanwhile, Baguio City Mayor Benjamin Magalong is calling for an ombudsman probe and a Commission on Audit (COA) review of the SC ruling and demanded accountability among officials behind the questioned appropriations.

Magalong urged the COA to scrutinize the increases and called on the Office of the Ombudsman to investigate and hold accountable any official found responsible for any wrongdoing. — Artemio Dumlao

View the original on The Philippine Star →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.