PunchMan United defender Martínez blames club hierarchy after Atlético defeatCNN TürkPolonya’yı Sarsan Casusluk: Veriler İsrail’e mi Aktarıldı?The Jerusalem PostNetanyahu denies ever having met Egypt's foreign intelligence chief despite contradictory recordsInquirerNIA completes 170 solar-powered irrigation projects in CalabarzonBollywood HungamaKhosla Ka Ghosla 2 release postponed to March 5, 2027Daily MaverickBOOK EXCERPT: Kitchens of the Karoo – how cooks of old mastered stone, sourdough and coffeeESPNTakeaways as Rays even series against Guardians한겨레청주시 수도권 쓰레기는 차단 ‘성공’…다른 지역 쓰레기 유입은 ‘글쎄’Inquirer EntertainmentFormer ‘RuPaul’s Drag Race’ music producer Lucian Piane dies in road accidentZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioBillboardCezary Skubiszewski to Be Saluted at 2026 Screen Music Awards20 MinutenSchweizer (73) kehrt wegen Handy um – und verschwindet spurlos
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, October 14, 2026

Federal judge indefinitely blocks Trump’s ban on three media outlets

Translate
Read All About It

optimistic7liss/iStock via Getty Images

A federal judge late Tuesday indefinitely barred the White House from enforcing a ban on three media outlets announced by President Donald Trump in mid-September.

The preliminary injunction by Judge Timothy Kelly extends his existing block on Trump’s ban of MS NOW, CNN, and Politico from the White House complex.

“President Trump’s own comments suggest that he intended the revocation of Plaintiffs’ hard passes to alter their reporting on him,” wrote Kelly, who was nominated by Trump for his seat in U.S. District Court in Washington.

Kelly, in his written opinion said the three outlets were likely to succeed on the claim in their pending lawsuit challenging the ban, which argues they were denied due process by Trump summarily barring them without giving them a chance to argue against that action.

“There is no evidence in the record that President Trump made the decision to revoke Plaintiffs’ hard passes on national security grounds from the get-go, nor at any time has he directly stated that national security was the reason for his decision,” Kelly wrote.

The ruling comes on the heels of a court hearing last Thursday where the DOJ defended the ban. Trump last month said he would appeal any decision by Kelly blocking his ban.

Recommended For You

Register for free to keep reading.

Create a free account to get unlimited breaking news and alerts when your stocks move.

View the original on Seeking Alpha →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.