The Jerusalem PostEl Al unveils new bedding, Jo Malone kits in passenger service overhaulESPNHurts out for season after blood clots discovered in Eagles QB's lungsESPN DeportesNBA 2026-27: Rankings, predicciones sobre los 30 equiposInquirerDizon: 3 nabbed for stealing parts of Diokno Pumping StationPunchN3bn power line: Scrap dealers demand proof of cable theft from ZulumRTP DesportoChampions: Farioli quer começar a "escalar a montanha" frente ao PSVDaily MaverickTHE CONVERSATION: Why are we so obsessed with true crime? It’s not just morbid curiosityFootball ItaliaAllegri: ‘I question myself every day, Napoli players must be defended’Anime News NetworkSTEEL BALL RUN JoJo's Bizarre Adventure ‒ Episodes 1-4GIGAZINE規制が厳しい現代社会に「オトナ」なアニメ表現を届ける気概と工夫を男2人が密室でみっちり語り倒す『ダークサモナーとデキている』『彼女の友達』プロデューサートーク濃密レポート
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Monday, October 19, 2026

Bank of England said to be reviewing Barclays’ handling of private credit loans

Translate

The Bank of England is reportedly looking into Barclays’ handling of loans linked to the embattled private credit sector.

The Bank’s regulatory arm, the Prudential Regulation Authority, started reviewing the matter earlier this year after concerns were raised by a Barclays insider, according to the Financial Times.

The concerns related to the way Barclays logged the derivatives used to finance the loans it issues to private credit firms. Those derivatives – financial contracts that track the performance of an underlying asset – are said to have been logged in the wrong portfolio, indicating they were less risky than they actually were.

That could mean the bank was not holding enough capital to cover potential losses, and could have boosted its profitability.

Barclays is said to have built up billions of dollars’ worth of exposure to private credit loans using derivatives, according to sources cited by the Financial Times.

The bank said in a statement: “Barclays takes seriously its regulatory obligations in markets where it operates. Barclays does not comment on its interactions with regulators.”

The Bank of England declined to comment.

Shares in Barclays fell by 3.5% on Monday, the second-biggest faller on the FTSE 100 index. The bank is due to report its latest financial results on Thursday.

Last year, Barclays’ chief executive, CS Venkatakrishnan, insisted it had the right controls in place to manage its exposure to the private credit industry, where critics worry lending standards have slipped.

Private credit firms – which form a core part of the shadow banking sector – use investor money to fund their loans to companies, rather than customer loans or deposits, and face less regulation as a result.

Traditional banks, worried about missing out on a booming market, started lending directly to private credit firms or their funds, and to companies that simultaneously borrowed from private credit firms. A growing number of banks have also been partnering with asset managers on private credit deals.

skip past newsletter promotion

However, critics worry that private credit players have been too lenient in deciding who to lend to, and regulators have said any fallout could destabilise traditional banks that are now intertwined with the industry.

Growing anxieties also triggered a multibillion-pound surge in withdrawals from some private credit funds earlier this year, forcing some to cap the amount of money that clients can pull out.

The private credit industry has been trying to recover after some high-profile company failures, including two private credit-backed US automotive companies, Tricolor and First Brands, last year, both of which were hit by fraud allegations. That was followed by the mortgage lender Market Financial Solutions (MFS), which collapsed in February amid allegations of fraud.

Barclays was among the banks that suffered losses on the back of Tricolor’s collapse, alongside JP Morgan. Barclays also took a £228m hit after MFS’ failure.

View the original on The Guardian →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.