InquirerOccidental Mindoro rations irrigation water amid El NiñoPunchVIDEO: How Kobe, LeBron, Giannis sought my guidance — Hakeem OlajuwonCNN TürkEski Trabzonsporlu Galatasaray'ın radarında: İşte masadaki teklifThe Jerusalem PostThe drone age for all: The real challenge is only beginning - opinionInquirer EntertainmentMaki renews ABS-CBN deal with Diamond Award, 2027 tour plansDaily MaverickSHARE WITH US: Tatjana Smith’s switch to the Netherlands: what do you think?ZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFObservador DesportoClima. Mau tempo veio para ficar?NHK 社会司法試験 ことしの合格者1595人 政府の目標を4年連続で超える20 Minuten«Mit zwölf musste ich schauen, dass mein Mami morgens aufsteht»Capital FMErratic Museveni son deactivates X handle after threats against Uganda VPRapplerLIVE UPDATES: Impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, November 11, 2026

Court junks Bong Revilla bid to seek dismissal of malversation case

Translate

Make this your preferred source to get more updates from this publisher on Google.

The Sandiganbayan denied the bid of former senator Ramon "Bong" Revilla, Jr. to ask the court to dismiss malversation charges against him in connection with the P92.8-million flood control project in Bulacan, the location of which has no physical structure.

This was confirmed by Atty. Dennis Pulma, Clerk of Court of the Sandiganbayan Third Division, which denied Revilla's leave of court to file demurrer to evidence.

A demurrer to evidence is a pleading asking the court to dismiss the case due to the prosecution's weak evidence.

Revilla already attached his demurrer to evidence in his leave of court pleading.

Pulma, however, said this was merely noted by the anti-graft court, meaning this was entered into the records.

Revilla is out on bail by virtue of the July 31 Sandiganbayan Third Division decision, which granted his petition for bail via a split 2-1 vote.

The ruling cited that the prosecution failed to present an "iota of proof" showing that Revilla had either explicitly or implicitly agreed to receive an advance kickback.

The bail decision is one of the grounds cited by Revilla in seeking leave of court to file demurrer to evidence.

Aside from Revilla, other listed respondents in the malversation case include the following former officials of the DPWH Bulacan First District Engineering Office including:

  • Brice Hernandez
  • Jaypee Mendoza
  • Arjay Domasig
  • Emelita Juat
  • Juanito Mendoza
  • Christina Pineda

All these former DPWH officials also filed petition for bail, but these were all denied by the Sandiganbayan Third Division. — VDV, GMA News

View the original on GMA News →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.